it’s like you believe you can tariff them expecting they won’t do the same. Why do you believe the rest of the world is not going to retaliate and why do you believe America can prosper without the rest of the world?

What’s the point of having a military alliance with countries you puts tariffs on? That’s unfriendly to say the least.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trump only ran to stay out of prison. Now he’s ripping the copper out of the walls to get as much money as he can before it all collapses under his ineptitude.

    Elon thinks he’s gonna be a trillionaire at the top of a technofeudal oligarchy. (He wants to be Arasaka from Cyberpunk but he’s gonna have a hard time doing that while all his businesses fail.)

  • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    fascism must always create more outsiders, must always create more enemies to keep control, to keep things directed.

    remember, fascism appropriates genuine upset and the fact that to the privileged, equality feels like persecution. it steers itself by creating enemies to hate. remember: people’s lives are genuinely fucking miserable. there is dystopian shit happening. and all of that is really complicated, and if people stopped to think about it for five minutes, they would pull a 1789.

    so they just keep adding more enemies, and more derangements like what the qanons call ‘baking’ but hitler just said was the way everyone should read books, until they live in a totally unhinged fantasy world, and any method of social control must engage with the fantasy.

    tl;dr: sacrificing external allies to fuel a persecution complex, keep control, entrench the madness, keep attention off the american elites that were at least rhetorically some of the initial targets.

          • Bigred1367@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            30
            ·
            4 days ago

            Hitler was left leaning. What side was trying to censor opponents and throw political opponents in jail? It was the left and it backfired.

            • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              4 days ago

              Hitler was not left leaning. He was supported by the old guard and the industrialists like Krupp until he out grew them and then turned on them. At the end of the day he was an autocrat, a totalitarian. Think was Gaddafi liberal? How about Suddam? They both had extensive social programs, but they were not left leaning. In the Weimar Republic it was the right wing courts that tried to censor and throw people in jail, and often let the right wing activists off the hook for similar offenses. Left and right wing groups can both censor and throw people in jail, ie USSR, but generally this is in service of totalitarianism, the ideology at that point is just a husk to keep people in line while people vye for control.

              • adm@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                4 days ago

                He’s not worth more than 3 words from me. Thank you for standing up for truth. I know it’s a loosing battle on the internet.

              • Bigred1367@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                4 days ago

                Who does that remind you of sir? Kind of reminds me of the today’s left with throwing political opponents in jail and letting the supporters of the left off the hook.

              • Bigred1367@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                4 days ago

                Well according to Hitler that his party was neither left nor right wing. He claimed it as a “syncretric movement”. It was essentially his own little sick movement.

                • My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Consolidation of power to a tiny coalition of privileged cronies with conditional impunity as long as they backed the leader. That’s not “conservative” or “liberal” or “right” or “left.” It’s just…autocratic. Have you read The Dictator’s Handbook by Bueno de Mesquita and Smith? It’s a very illuminating reference and eschews the entire argument of “left vs right” in favor of a ruling-coalition size relative to the ruled population model and it appears to be quite accurate in predicting and explaining the behavior of politicians and rulers, Hitler included.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              Exactly one political party in US history ran a candidate from a prison cell, do you know who it was and what the party was called?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hitler put all the leftists in camps and also purged the left wing of his own party, he came to power by being appointed by center-right big business interests specifically as a way to crush the left and destroy labor unions, and those interests did quite well under his rule, the term “privatization” was literally first coined to describe the Nazi economy.

          So those are the points showing the Nazis were right wing. The points showing the Nazis were left wing are… they censored speech (which the right also does, all the time) and they have socialist in their name (curious on whether you consider the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea a democracy).

  • turnip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Project 2025. The goal is to remove all tariffs and other limitations against the US.

    Canada for instance has laws on antibiotics for dairy, foreign ownership for banks and telcos, various things like that. India has tariffs on everything.

    The document outlines crazy things like capital punishment and a border wall, its clearly Trumps handbook. It’s all in there.

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      OP’s also not going to get an answer that’s interesting or helpful out of them even if you go to where they live and ask and don’t get immediately flamed for asking.

      There’s no acceptable answer for it. I have plenty of conservative friends and I could make sense of voting for Trump the first time. Not for me, FUCK that, but not all Trump v1 supporters were racists and there were valid conservative reasons to vote for him. He was definitely an unknown, nobody could have told you with certainty how he would act once in office. I could have told you what I expected and it was about as horrible as I expected, but people often see things in politicians that they want to see, rather than seeing what’s really there.

      But any of the “OK to vote for Trump v1” falls apart completely for Trump v2. We saw what his first term was like and especially how it ended. His campaign in 2024 was even more unhinged and less grounded in reality than in 2016. Voting for him in 2024 is really inexcusable.

      The US will be unimaginably worse off by the time Trump leaves office this time, tariffs and tax cuts for the rich and inflation, it’s going to be bad for Americans on an individual level. On a global level, Trump will have shredded alliances and any goodwill we had built up over the past decades, while also validating and confirming the world’s worst concerns about us.

      And when Trump does finally leave office, the people you want to hear from will largely feel like it was a phenomenal presidency. It is a cult and logic and reason don’t have anything to do with it.

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’d love to believe this, but cynical me is thinking about those conservatives that look at Milei in Argentina and legitimately think it’s going great.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Milei’s performance really does depend on your metric.

          If all you care about is inflation and regulations, then he’s doing all right. Somewhere between fantastic and “eh, he’s getting there” depending on how you squint.

          If you care about how many people are in poverty, or struggling to eat, he has been a disaster.

          Conservatives don’t care about suffering. The suffering is natural. Life is hard. Lots of people are losers. Trying to stop the suffering just moves the pain from people who deserve to suffer (the poor) to people who don’t deserve it. (The rich)

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I have my doubts about that. Most of the mass posters are too “conservative” and lean extremely hard into stereotypes. They take racism and bigotry just a bit too far in many cases and it doesn’t quite align with actual conservative bigots and racists that I know.

        It wouldn’t be surprising if most of the “conservative” communities are part of the same troll farm that lives primarily on other instances.

        This is all speculation, of course. But, organized campaigns to spread discourse on social media are real and some of these trolls are really good at what they do.

    • LuckyPierre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Sadly true. We actively searched for alternatives when we realised other channels were getting too manipulative and full of hate. Those who stayed haven’t even realised it.

  • mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Stock market manipulation. Look at who moved in to make big trades after the market plunged. Follow the money.

  • gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    The point?

    I see it like this.

    Profit profit profit at the expensive of all Americans for 4 years.

    The next 4 years let Democrats clean up the mess, Democrats are weak anyway.

    Then milk the American people again for another 4 years. The cycle is nonstop.

    This is malicious greed but everyone keeps thinking these people are idiots.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I haven’t seen any republicans here so I’ll also offer my opinion as a sane person ….

    1. Narcissism. There is only me, and other. There are no allies, just suckers. it’s all about me. Right here. Right now.
    2. Bullying. Trump styles himself as a great negotiator but from the outside it looks a lot more like bullying. And if you believe his commitments, you’re a sucker. He thinks this is “making deals” but is the only way he knows how to operate
  • Swordgeek@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    “What’s the point?” The point is to seize power and get rich.

    They will destroy whatever they want or need in order to become rich and powerful.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    You won’t get logical answers to this because there isn’t one. Maybe they’re just that dumb. Maybe they just want to tank the economy a bit so the rich and gobble up more during the dip. Maybe they just actually love Russia. Maybe they’re being secretly black mailed by Russia.

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    You’re never going to get a satisfying answer to this question, because there is no actual reason. If you want, you can go peek in on the conservative subreddits and watch their gold-medal winning mental gymnastics, but the reason Trump is doing this is Putin told him to. The U.S. is destroying themselves for no gain.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 days ago

      for no gain.

      Nearly $3 billion USD flowed through the TRUMP cryptocoin rugpull, whoever owned initial coins made very, very large gains.

      The $3 billion in quid buys a lot of anti-Ukraine pro quo

      But, thanks to the Supreme Court, Trump could go on national TV and say he change US policy on Ukraine because he was bribed and he’d still be immune to any legal consequences (other than impeachment, but never anything criminal).

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nearly $3 billion USD flowed through the TRUMP cryptocoin

        But wait, there’s more. Us taxpayer money will now be used to “invest” in these crypto scams.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        There’s a lot of traitors in this country, but the conservatives on the Supreme Court may be at the top of the list.

      • zildjiandrummer1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The reality is that these people were/are unhappy in their lives due to stagnation in their finances/jobs, poor healthcare, and they don’t have a tight local community. Then these dumb, angry people are primed to accept someone who says they’ll fix their lives, and knows how to talk right to them. Everything else is just toppings, but that’s really the meat of it.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s like that scene in the Incredibles where Mr. Incredible gets inside the robot, and has it tear itself to pieces. Except an entire country. And ~88,000,000 people voted against self-destruction and are being dragged off a cliff.

  • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    While I have no issue with Republicans being shunned for their unashamed fascism, it does mean threads like this are essentially pointless because almost none will actually participate and the ones who do will be downvoted into oblivion.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 days ago

      And dont forget, we are on Lemmy. Everything that’s somewhat conservative gets bullied out quite fast. C/conservative started as a legit community and got turned into a meme community. I think this speaks for itself.

      • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        My general dislike for modern conservatism to the side, it does reflect a wider issue with lemmy. There is no diversity of opinion on anything. There are no niche communities. Either you like the political and tech subs and the meme subs which are, at a mininum, 60% political, or there really is nothing for you here.

        The manga and anime subs can be good for keeping up with new releases, but not there’s next to no actual discussion.

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          There’s absolutely diversity of opinion, I see trans and Tankie arguments pretty frequently.

          What is generally true is the majority of Lemmy users seem to lean left and are generally more techy, makes sense given the main reasons why you’d seek out the fediverse vs a centralized social media.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          There’s a lot of diversity of opinion between leftists and liberals. Generally speaking, conservatives don’t contribute anything and drag down the quality of debate because they are openly anti-intellectual, and their presence also drives away people who are actually worth having. The only thing that would happen if there were more conservatives on here would be more cable news tier screaming matches and more verbal attacks on minorities. Liberals still only want to talk and think at a cable news level, but at least they aren’t openly hateful and anti-intellectual.

          People are more likely to change their minds or have productive conversations when they approach a topic from the same basic values and beliefs about the world, like if two people agree on the goal of uplifting the global proletariat, they can discuss how best to go about it, but if one person’s goal is to uplift the global proletariat and the other’s is, idk, to drop minorities out of helicopters, then both are just going to be screaming at each other. Not only that, but if two people are discussing how to uplift the poor while the other guy’s in the room, it’s going to have a negative effect on their ability to do so, because they’ll constantly have to worry about everything they say getting attacked by dumb, right-wing arguments. Imagine two doctors trying to discuss the nuances of their profession in the same room as an antivax nutjob.

        • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah now try being absolutely unknowledgeable when it comes to tech and very much into makeup, skincare, 90 day fiance and parenting content. Lemmy, it’s been nice, but after one and a half years I started lurking to Reddit every once in a while again.

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            It sucks that niche things like that haven’t picked up yet, however be the change you want to see, create a community and invite like minded people to post there.

            I think the biggest barrier of entry is that people don’t understand it, and they’re not going to until they try in all honesty.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Lurking is fine. I wouldn’t bother creating an account. Reddit is bot-moderated now. It’s been a real shitshow and it’s not really worth having an account anymore.

          • HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve definitely thought about trying to get back onto Reddit once I get a computer they don’t recognize.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I disagree with a ton of stuff, but Ive already been banned from one community so for the most part I keep it civil. I haven’t had much issue arguing against the common opinion here besides the down votes, but I see downvoted comment chains all the time so I’m not as concerned they will be hidden.