• Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Centi is familiar to everyone from centi-meter, I have deci in deci-Bel for my optical signals at work, and I know hecto is used for hecto-Pascal which replaced the milli-bar. But I can’t think of one for deka, can anyone give an example of a unit where deka is used often?

  • Estiar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This may be an unpopular opinion, but I really like the foot. It’s great because you can divide it by 2, 3 and 4 and even 6 and it still works. I think it’s a lot better to use than the metric system when working with wood.

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Celsius isn’t actually metric, per say. Its based on the freezing point of water while farenheight is based on the freezing point of mercury.

      Celcius is what most of the world used because 0 is where water freezes and is very relevant to the human condition, hence why its the most used.

      It was adopted as part of the metric SI system but unlike all the units developed for metric which actually use the above scale, I do not believe there is any practical use for this with celcius.

      Kelvin does use this however.

  • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I do wish we metric places (or at least Canada) were more flexible and familiar with the whole system. Sure we have milliliters and centimeters and kilograms, but people say things all the time like 2000km or 2 million kgs, or even things like 25000mAh. And I get it, people get into a frame of reference and want to stay there, but I wish people had the agility and practice to say 2 megameters, 2 gigagrams, and, well 25 amp hours, and still be understood. That last one’s not hard, but packaging still seems to be stupid about it.

  • SpinItBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Put this on the Ronald Reagan did it pile. Jimmy Carter started us on the path to metric and then Reagan halted it.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trans girl I use to know called herself femto. I assumed it was because of her foot fetish but maybe it was related to the metric system.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If the average American mind only knew about its goverment being metric.

      • crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We recognize both systems so that government is not metric. Freedom units are still primarily used over metric. Metric is used in science and academia over Imperial.

        I actually don’t think that the biggest barrier is the average American. I think the barrier is the logistics of replacing millions of signs and other material.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    While we’re on the subject, can we please kill off “kilowatt hours”. Fuckers, those are Joules, 3.6 Megajoules specifically.

    • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah it’s more relatable to humans regarding electricity consumption, the consumer would be confused and scared seeing 3.6 megajoules on a bill and not actually understand how power usage of watts of appliances would convert into Joule energy units. That’s why electric cars motor powers are still rated in Watts and the bill shows a relatable term.

      To add to that, that’s why so many metric countries (not USA) still use imperial units colloquially because they are more relatable in real life like lbs and inches and feet. But then would use Km and grams in other contexts quite normally. And knots still always make more sense to pilots and sailors.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        People are just used to kWh. There’s nothing about it that’s more intuitive, it’s just more familiar. But measuring things in hogsheads and barleycorns used to be familiar too. Sometimes being familiar isn’t as important as following standards. Eventually the standard units will become familiar, and since they’re standard units, they’re much easier to work with.

        not actually understand how power usage of watts of appliances would convert into Joule energy units

        1 joule per watt each second. It’s dead easy. That’s why Joules should be used.

        That’s why electric cars motor powers are still rated in Watts

        Yes, power should be measured in Watts, that’s the standard unit for power, just like Joules are the standard unit for energy.

        To add to that, that’s why so many metric countries (not USA) still use imperial units colloquially because they are more relatable in real life like

        No they’re not, it’s just that people are used to them. The people whose minds are the hardest to change are the old people who have used some random unit for all their lives and don’t want to have to get used to some newfangled standard (a standard that’s actually hundreds of years old at this point). Because the old people refuse to change, the country gets stuck using that old unit, even if it’s informally, and so that’s what the kids learn, then they become old people and are also inflexible.

        There’s nothing about an inch or a pound that’s naturally more intuitive than a centimetre or a kilogram. It’s just what you’re used to. Go somewhere where people grew up with metric and for them using anything other than metric feels strange and awkward. Pilots and sailors are used to knots, they never had to switch, but when they do complex calculations they mostly avoid using knots because doing conversions with non-SI units is such a massive pain in the ass.

        • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          People are just used to kWh. There’s nothing about it that’s more intuitive, it’s just more familiar.

          No, you’re arguing for a second-based unit in a context where the hour-based unit dominates common use. The reason why we use hours is because hours is much more familiar across the contexts where electrical usage is metered: monthly bills, daily production/consumption cycles. Everyone knows that 3 days is 72 hours but pretty much nobody can come up with the answer in seconds without actually applying a conversion factor and making the calculation.

          Energy is especially prone to the problem of how it’s calculated, simply because it’s such an important quantity to measure or calculate. Sometimes we use calories or electron volts because those make for easier conversions to other quantities in the context of temperature/heat or particle physics, respectively.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            No, you’re arguing for a second-based unit in a context where the hour-based unit dominates common use

            Yes. Common use. You’re making my point for me. It’s what people are more familiar with.

            is much more familiar across the contexts where electrical usage is metered

            Yes, it’s what people are more familiar with.

            Everyone knows that 3 days is 72 hours

            Who cares about 3 days? Do you run your hair dryer for 3 days or 60 seconds? Do you cook something on the stove for several minutes, or several days?

            Again, it’s just what people are familiar with.

            • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s what people are more familiar with.

              Yes, I’m advocating for using hours as a familiar unit, instead of kiloseconds or megaseconds or teraseconds. You’ll never get the world on metric time.

              Who cares about 3 days

              Everyone? If I’m doing calculations for solar panel production, it’s a lot easier to work with hours instead of seconds. If I’m dealing with usage patterns across the weekly cycle of business days and weekends, hours is a much easier unit to work with than seconds.

              We organize time around hours and days, so it only makes sense for there to be an hour-based unit for easy conversion.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Yes, I’m advocating for using hours as a familiar unit

                Like hogsheads per rod.

                instead of kiloseconds or megaseconds or teraseconds. You’ll never get the world on metric time.

                Those might be used eventually at some point in the future, but right now our life is dominated by the rotation of the earth, the movement of the earth around the sun, etc. So, other units that correspond to those natural events make sense.

                But, I’m not advocating anything radical, just use the standard SI unit for energy instead of some awkward non-SI unit based on SI units where the only thing it has going for it is that it’s familiar.

                If I’m doing calculations for solar panel production

                You aren’t, I can tell because you advocate for kWh. And your denominator in that case wouldn’t be “per 3 days”.

                We organize time around hours and days

                And minutes, and seconds. Most of us use all of these.

                so it only makes sense for there to be an hour-based unit for easy conversion.

                No, it doesn’t. Joules are the unit that makes sense when talking about energy.

                • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 minutes ago

                  Do you get this upset about the world using km/h instead of m/s? How about hectares instead of a power of 3 of square meter?

                  Or electron volts in particle physics? Or calories in food?

                  People use these because the conversions are easier in the contexts where they’re discussed.

      • Linda R@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What makes lbs, inch and feet more relatable?

        How is half a kg more relatable than one kg? Or how are 2½ cm more relatable than 1 cm? Or how are 30 cm more relatable than 10 cm or 100 cm?

        I keep seeing your argument here and there, but I just cannot fathom what is meant by it. For me there’s nothing relatable at all in “foot”. It falls awkwardly between 10 cm and 100 cm and I cannot really make heads or tails about it. Except if I divide it by three, which gives me an approximate number in metres. But then the number could have been in metres in the first place.

        • MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Relatable I don’t think is the right word. Intuitive in its use and measurement, in specific scenarios.

          Measurements always have a scaling and a precision problem. Humans are bad at math and scale, and really struggle mentally with numbers more than a few digits. If the number is too big, someone will either just accept it or ignore it. We like our nice round numbers, and funnily enough like our small prime numbers (1, 2, 3, and 5) and first few multiples of primes (4, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20) and numbers that just shift the decimal point around (10, 100, 1000)

          Reference frames are also incredibly useful to us, especially when communicating.

          The metric system jumps straight to moving the decimal place around, where imperial let’s you play around with other divisors. Let’s say I have a single digit of some unit and I want to half it. Generally in metric this is fine, doesn’t really add to the mental cognitive load. Half it again, or divide by one of the other primes, and the number of digits starts to explode (or is infinitely repeating). For the scalers within the imperial system, they naturally let you divide down and even re-express the same measurement in a different unit with fewer integer numbers and no precision loss

          Edit: Another example. Computer scientist don’t use metric, we bastardized parts of it and then invented extra units that fit the need and intuitiveness of working with them. We don’t use deci/deca or centi/centa, we bastardized kilo into 2^10 since 1024 is close to a thousand keeping it a nice power of two, a byte is 8 bits for the same reason and a nibble is 4 bits because halving bytes occasionally is useful. A word typically is 16 except when it is 32 bits, in which case 16 is a half word. Then we have dwords and qwords being twice and four times the size of a words, and then a page historically has been 4096 bytes since 1024 is kinda small, but newer systems sometime say a page is 64KB since 2^16 = 65536

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          While I think the metric system should be used more, I’ll also defend frantional measurements when precision matters. Decimal measurements only increase by a factor of 10. So if your precision is 1/8 of a meter, you have to either round to the nearest meter, overstate your precision (0.125 implies precision to 1mm), or essentially write a sentence (“125mm plus or minus 62.5mm”).

          With fractional, the precision is built into the denominator. If your measurement of half a meter is precise to half a meter, you record it as “1/2”. If it’s precise to an pitch of a meter, you record it as “4/8”.

      • Jiral@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry you totally lost me on the second paragraph. What you describe there is basically a British thing. On the continent people use m, kg and such for daily life things.

        Knots are used because of historic influences and inertia. Imperial units in some special cases are exclusively used because of the influence of the US and again inertia.

        • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Oh ok just a British thing so the ENTIRE BRITISH EMPIRE. Cool. Oh knots are used for historic influences like… Places that use imperial units colloquially but are official metric? Ohhh cool as well. Thanks for repeating just what I said and agreeing.

          • Jiral@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            If you head actually read what I wrote instead of just making stuff up, you’d know that I was talking about the European contintent, on which, the tiny peninsula of Gibraltar aside, the British Empire had zero possessions after metrication. People there don’t use “inches” or “pounds” colloqually. Where I life they also don’t use some local old customary units for that, they simply use SI units for weight and dimensions. You are 176 cm tall and weigh 73kg …

            And that does contradict your claim that generally people prefer those old customary units in daily life. They only do if they were raised that way.

            The reason why customary units are still more widely used in daily life in regions formerly part of the British Empire is because there metrication was much more delayed, ie happened for real a lot later. The old ways take time to wither away, like they have in regions that had it all a lot earlier. It is ridiculous to suggest that those customary units are more useful to people in daily life but only if transition to metric for real wasn’t too long ago.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Metric haters when they realize their electricity is measured in Volts (metric unit), not in “relatable” units like Sparks: