TimeSink
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 days ago

There's 'overwhelming evidence' tariffs have raised consumer prices, says Bank of America

www.businessinsider.com

external-link
message-square
49
link
fedilink
619
external-link

There's 'overwhelming evidence' tariffs have raised consumer prices, says Bank of America

www.businessinsider.com

vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 days ago
message-square
49
link
fedilink
The analysts wrote in a note on Friday that consumers have covered about 50% to 70% of the cost of tariffs to date.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    But they still support them…

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    10 days ago

    How did they figure that one out? Did they Open their eyes to see the most obvious fucking thing ever?

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 days ago

      There actually was something in the article that surprised me:

      The analysts also said consumers have paid for about 50% to 70% of the total tariff cost to date.

      I was shocked it wasn’t 100% to 120%. The fact that any businesses are shouldering even a portion of the tariffs is incredible. I fully expected them to go “Oh tariff is 50%? Better charge the consumer 60% just so we get our cut.”

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        10 days ago

        Theres a game of chicken going on. Try to hold out until the illegal tariffs are refunded so you dont lose customers.

        • snooggums@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yup, and if they are rescinded the companies get to double dip as they get the tariffs back and don’t have to share the refund with customers.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          Don’t forget classic market pressure. Consumers were already struggling, if your product goes up too much many simply can’t buy it

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I wonder if it is by item or by dollar value. I imagine smaller businesses are often more likely to shoulder the burder of the tariff than larger, because they are more reliant on customer satisfaction. I’m talking out of my ass, though

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    10 days ago

    We don’t care about overwhelming evidence in this administration.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 days ago

      Evidence is “treason”

  • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    In other news, it appears that water is wet.

    • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Water is not wet though, what water touches is wet

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not this shit again.

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Water that touches other water is wet.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Ah… but what is the quantum of water that you can separate from a bucket of water that then becomes “dry”?

          • AngularViscosity@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            If you heat it up enough into steam, there’s probably enough separation of molecules for a split microsecond at any given moment.

          • snooggums@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Surface tension.

    • Red0ctober@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Appears!?!?

      • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 days ago

        The news doesn’t like to commit to a position these days.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          “Unbiased!!!” (Yeah, right)

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      deleted by creator

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    10 days ago

    Shocking: making things more expensive doesn’t lower the prices!

    • FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 days ago

      Hm, but what if we just haven’t tarrifed hard enough yet?

    • fartographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      We just aren’t importing enough bootstraps

  • shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 days ago

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      “You can’t hear pictures”

  • vegeta@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 days ago

    Sho nit

  • Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 days ago

    The fact there is even a discussion around it is wild to me. Of course tariffs would raise consumer prices. That’s how they work

  • chilldrivenspade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Next time, baby!

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      There’s overwhelming evidence that our leadership is criminally corrupt. There is overwhelming evidence the Earth is not flat and all of our scientific models are accurate. There is overwhelming evidence of human-created climate change. There is overwhelming evidence that vaccines do not cause autism. There is overwhelming evidence that science and fact based education about sexuality in school prevents pregnancy, reduces teen suicides and prepares people for the world. There is overwhelming evidence that the covid vaccine works, is safe and prevented countless deaths. There is overwhelming evidence that racial diversity and integration reduces racism broadly and creates safer, happier communities. There is overwhelming evidence that Israel has been committing genocide against a civilian population.

      I’m tired boss.

  • Ice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    …yes, that is the purpose of tariffs. Raising prices on imported goods until they become so expensive that local goods are competitive. This automatically increases consumer prices. It causes a huge shock upon introduction and over time it (in theory anyway) should promote domestic production by undercutting foreign competition.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    MAGATs: Bank of America is WOKE now!!! People go to Wells Fargo!

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      Trump will take his sharpie and change their name to Bank of Mexico, then start an investigation into BoM’s history of funding Antifa.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 days ago

    They must be writing this hoping maga reads it because this is already known to everyone else.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 days ago

      If MAGA could read, they’d be very upset

      • AngularViscosity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        If MAGA could read, they’d be very upset applaud this as yet another win for the Trump administration

        Up is down in MAGA world

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      They already read an article written by ChatGPT that told them the opposite.

  • slothrop@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    “zzzzzzz…FaKe NeWzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz”
    –maga

  • xc2215x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 days ago

    Tariffs have been a disaster for sure.

  • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    Hey Bank of America, GO FUCK YOURSELF.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.73K users / day
  • 7.16K users / week
  • 11.4K users / month
  • 23.6K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 26.3K subscribers
  • 20.5K Posts
  • 403K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org