• SuperCub@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The statement reflects the actions of the Kamala campaign and the Dem party, so I believe it. Will Democrats ever change, though? Not until the old guard relinquishes their tight grasp on the party and allows it to operate democratically. The old guard are corrupt and they are paid by the same ultra wealthy donors that pay Republicans. The only reason the Tea Party was successful in taking over the Republican party was that there was a huge amount of funding behind them. An equivalent leftist force does not exist because there is no monied interest that would fund an insurgency on the left (except for the masses— think Bernie 2016, 2020, but we would need even more to create a lasting insurgency of equal scale). In light of this, the Democratic party has continuously pursued a “third way” approach to become essentially Republican with some social equality. The Democratic brand stands for nothing anymore.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The old guard are corrupt and they are paid by the same ultra wealthy donors that pay Republicans.

      I don’t think it’s actually possible to win national elections in this country post citizens united without the ultra wealthy donor class. I’d love to be wrong, but I’m pretty sure I’m not.

  • AriesAspect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Unless it’s aoc or bernies sanders. I’m not voting blue ever again. Actually crazy they** lost to orange, again

    • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If the next dem candidate doesnt run as an anti-establishment candidate, and call out the party leaders that have done such a terrible job, they will lose again and again and again etc.

      For one thing someone eventually has to admit that Bill Clinton is a creep who should not be praised anymore. The fact that the Kamala campaign used him as a surrogate in 2024 is delusional

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Reminder: this is the same Teamster that spoke at the Republican convention, making these comments to Tucker Carlson.

    You probably shouldn’t take this at face value and assume this was her attitude toward labor in general.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      A major union head went on Tucker Carlson’s podcast… gross. Harris could have done more to appeal to workers, but this dude can’t paint himself as a neutral politically-impartial leader!

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s bullshit on it’s face. Biden told Congress they should pass the PRO Act, Harris echoed that ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL.

      One of the provisions of the PRO Act is to gut right-to-work laws by allowing Unions to collect dues from every employee at a Union shop.

      So the guy is just lying about that, of course there’s no way for me to know if she wagged her finger in a Teamster’s face.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        49 minutes ago

        It’s imbecilic to make a comment like this when someone is making it explanation of something else.

        If all you have to say in this thread are childish insults and attacks, degrading from the conversation and not contributing to it at all, leave the platform, no one wants you here. Go back to Reddit.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Lmfao you are gonna love the next four years. Unless youre rich, then you actually are going to love the next four years. Probably a pot more than four years i suspect

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      With who her enemy was, it doesnt matter who she said it to. The fact that she had to say it in the first place means Teamsters is an enemy of the country.

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m sure one of a great many statements that aged like milk. The sheer contempt that Democrat politicians have for voters is breathtaking. Maybe some day they’ll care about voters the way they very obviously care about corporate donors.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      I don’t understand this.

      The statement made means “are you with me or not, I’m not going to stop on your behalf”

      And generally the campaign trail was pro workers rights, the activism history was for workers rights.

      So it sounds like teamsters had something else going on? It seems like this thread is reading it wrong.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Judging by their performance in the last three presidential elections with absolutely zero course correction, I wouldn’t hold my breath.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        45 minutes ago

        Given the number of people in this thread stating they’ll never vote Democrat again I don’t expect that to change.

        I’m pretty pissed at the system myself but in no way am I going to encourage more Republican leadership. Which is far far worse than what we would get otherwise.

        It’s really weird to shoot yourself in the foot just to spite your hand.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Maybe some day they’ll care about voters the way they very obviously care about corporate donors.

      How are you coming away with that the lesson to learn? The guys that won care even less for voters. The lesson appears to be: “Say whatever you think voters want to hear at that exact moment with no intention of following through for their benefit.”

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        Most of the thread seems to take this lesson. Which is crazy.

        They would literally rather have a pandering candidate who just lies to them to get their votes and then does nothing after then a candidate who is transparent about what they can and cannot do, and pushes realistic change that can actually be achieved within their term.

        This country is fucked, because the voter base is comprised of morons. The education system has failed this country and there really isn’t any turning back now. If entire generations lack critical thinking ability then they lack the ability to make good choices, and are unable to see past their nose, never mind vote.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That’s rather the point isn’t it? Republicans lie constantly about everything but those lies are about things their voters want. Democrats meanwhile tell their voters that they’ll get what Democrats are gracious enough to give them and be happy they’re not as bad as the Republicans. In either case neither party is delivering what progressive voters are asking for. Then Democrats wonder why they have voter turnout problems.

        People are sick and tired of showing up to vote for the lesser evil and the result being either things only get very slightly worse or much worse depending on who wins. It’s particularly hard for people to justify investing that time and effort when they’re struggling to just survive day to day and keep a roof over their head and food in their stomachs.

        I and many others tried our best this last election to keep Trump out of office but we can all only do so much when the Democrats are working against us every step of the way. We need an actual progressive running on progressive policies out of the Democrats if they want to win an election, because running as diet conservative isn’t cutting it anymore.

        People gave Bernie a lot of shit for being a populist but you know what? He motivated people. His supporters were excited to get out and vote for him. Unfortunately he was never given the chance and instead we got the same tired “we’ll run on Republican policies from two decades ago” Democrats.

        Even Obama, the most “progressive” Democrat in at least fifty years, promised socialized healthcare like the rest of the first world countries have but ended up delivering a watered down half assed Republican healthcare plan instead.

        So yeah, people are sick and tired of Democrats that only ever seem to be able to successfully deliver things wealthy corporate donors are asking for.

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          40 minutes ago

          Democrats at least in the last cycle told their voters what they can get based on what is achievable during a term.

          It was a realistic outlook. It wasn’t just lying and pandering.

          What seems to be what you would prefer which is absolutely crazy. Why do you want to be lied to just for your vote and then no actual action taken? Somehow that is better than being told what is real and then action being taken on what is possible?

          The amount of commentary in this thread that share the sentiment is mind-boggling. If most of the voter base in this country only cares about lip service then this place is well and truly fucked. Nothing can fix that, not within a couple generations.

          If this is the case then idiocracy really was a documentary…

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          That’s rather the point isn’t it? Republicans lie constantly about everything but those lies are about things their voters want. Democrats meanwhile tell their voters that they’ll get what Democrats are gracious enough to give them and be happy they’re not as bad as the Republicans. In either case neither party is delivering what progressive voters are asking for. Then Democrats wonder why they have voter turnout problems.

          But again, the lesson Democrats need to learn is that American voters just care about what the candidate says during the campaign, not actual policy delivered if elected. So Democrats should adopt the same method of the GOP, simply straight up lying to the electorate and the Democrats will have a better chance of winning.

          People are sick and tired of showing up to vote for the lesser evil

          I’m not buying this as a reason they voted for Trump. If they saw Harris as the “lesser evil” then that would acknowledge they are actively voting for the “greater evil”.

          The result being either things only get very slightly worse or much worse depending on who wins. It’s particularly hard for people to justify investing that time and effort when they’re struggling to just survive day to day and keep a roof over their head and food in their stomachs.

          So they vote for the one that will make it MUCH worse?

          I and many others tried our best this last election to keep Trump out of office but we can all only do so much when the Democrats are working against us every step of the way. We need an actual progressive running on progressive policies out of the Democrats if they want to win an election, because running as diet conservative isn’t cutting it anymore.

          Again, that appears to be the wrong message. Voters didn’t want any measure of progressive policies. They voted for Trump with his regressive policies. Democrats apparently need to do the same to win votes.

          So yeah, people are sick and tired of Democrats that only ever seem to be able to successfully deliver things wealthy corporate donors are asking for.

          I disagree with your assessment, but that is exactly what Trump is going to do, and he got the votes, so its the winning strategy apparently.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            You seem to be assuming that people who were going to vote for Harris decided to vote for Trump. That’s not even remotely true. What happened is a lot of people who would have voted for Harris stayed home, while a lot of people that normally don’t vote at all decided to vote for Trump.

            Democrats could actually win an election or two by running the Republican playbook of lying through their teeth. It more or less worked for Obama who talked a big game then delivered on very little of it. But ultimately that would be a losing strategy. Democrats are not like Republicans, they not only want to hear policies they agree with, they expect to see them implemented.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              You seem to be assuming that people who were going to vote for Harris decided to vote for Trump.

              I’m not. Those voters stayed home. The ones that voted like to be lied to. A Democrat candidate can choose to lie just like Trump does. Same voters in play. These are the ones that vote and elect presidents.

              Democrats could actually win an election or two by running the Republican playbook of lying through their teeth.But ultimately that would be a losing strategy.

              Trump was elected twice on this. So clearly it works.

              Democrats are not like Republicans, they not only want to hear policies they agree with, they expect to see them implemented.

              Its as you said, Democrats won’t vote for it, but a Democrat candidate doesn’t need Democrat votes anymore to get elected. If you just need to make every opportunistic empty promise to get elected (as Trump did), then that is clearly the winning strategy now. This is what Americans want. They voted for it.

              • orclev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 hours ago

                No they still need Democrat voters. Republicans won because their supporters vote for anyone with an R next to their name no matter what policies they have, so their lies are to convince the gullible morons that don’t really care about the party affiliation, they just want things to be better (and are too stupid to realize Republican policies will do the opposite). Neither parties core supporters are enough to win an election on their own, they need all of them plus some of the independents.

                That’s what Trump did, he got all the Republicans plus a chunk of independents. If Democrats tried the same playbook and then didn’t deliver on their promises they would lose the votes of the core Democrat voters and without them the independents aren’t enough to win the election. Republicans are a party of loyalty. The party goes above everything else. Democrats are a party of ideals. If you fail to demonstrate the ideals you lose the votes. That’s why it would ultimately be a losing strategy for the DNC. They’d win a few elections but when it became apparent they’re full of shit the Democrat voters would stop showing up.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        The GOP, unlike the DNC, absolutely care what their voters think. That’s the whole point of the culture war project.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I mean you’re not wrong but that doesn’t make them better than the DNC, at least in terms of policy. The GOP enacts policies they know will hurt their voters but lie and tell them they’ll help them. Then when those policies inevitably make things worse they lie again and claim they would have worked, but Democrats/minorities fucked it up. That has been their go to move since Reagan and it’s worked amazingly well. Reaganomics/trickle down economics has never once in history worked to do anything but make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Likewise cutting taxes doesn’t do anything but hurt the poor and middle class. But the GOP time and time again puts forward this myth that both of those policies will help the working class and their room temperature IQ supporters gobble it up despite it never once in over 40 years actually working.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            That’s exactly never said anything about better. The GOP is worse than the DNC by all measures, but to our misfortune they’re also competent, is what I wanted to say.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The GOP, unlike the DNC, absolutely care what their voters think. That’s the whole point of the culture war project.

          Of course they care about what voters think. They need to know what to say to lie to them. It doesn’t mean they’ll actually intact policies that will help Americans. The most working class Americans might get is minorities being subjugated more, which for some is a win.

    • spacecadet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Don’t worry, next election they can get Hitler’s grandson or Putins niece to help them campaign. That should get the average everyday person to come out and vote for them! Everyone loves relatives of super powerful war criminals, right?

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    The silver lining of 2024 is watching Kamala’s entire political career implode from her own hubris. She’s now resigned to HRC hot-potato status that only further polarizes the Dem base.

    If the Dems had any sense they’d be distancing themselves from her entire campaign, indefinitely.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The silver lining of 2024 is watching Kamala’s entire political career implode from her own hubris

      That was the silver lining on her FIRST presidential run, but the DNC didn’t let it happen then and probably won’t now.

      A woman of color representing several different groups of people and who will pretend to be progressive sometimes but always change her mind into whatever the donor-determined party line is?

      She’s catnip to a Dem leadership desperately trying to compensate for not caring about the working class by pretending that optics equal substance 😮‍💨

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I wonder what Kamela’s… Wait does that headline say Kamala? I thought it was Kamela

    Whatever, I wonder how her feet taste. I’m not asking because I"m a creepy feet pervert, but because Harris seems to have her foot in her mouth a lot these days.

  • JoYo 🇺🇸@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    that’s cool, they’re already union and do not give a fuck about the wagies that will now have to union under Republican rule. they got theirs.