Colorado Representative Lauren Boebert’s campaign said that it was “investigating some very unusual voting patterns,” as the MAGA congresswoman was on the brink of losing her reelection bid.

As Democrat Eileen Laubacher’s lead over Boebert grew slightly Thursday in the race to represent Colorado’s 4th District, Boebert’s campaign released a statement suggesting foul play. Scott Gessler, the attorney for the campaign, claimed that the votes had been “trending” in Boebert’s favor since election night, “consistently lowering the margin under one percentage point.”

“We are investigating some very unusual voting patterns and expect this election to head to a recount, one way or another,” Gessler continued.

As of Friday morning, Laubacher was still leading Boebert 48.75 percent to 47.94 percent, with 97 percent reporting. The two candidates had a margin of 3,069 votes, more than three times the automatic recount threshold of 921 votes. Boebert’s campaign could still choose to pay for a recount.

  • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was wondering which Nazi would break first.

    Maybe she should go work out her energy by wanking off some dude in public.

    • WFH@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I am surprised none of them except her are screeching and fighting teeth and nails over “election fraud”. They can’t concede defeat, it’s neither in the fascist handtweet (because they can’t read a handbook) and they are all going to be prosecuted. Unless they plan to get AIPAC-funded traitors break D ranks and/or pass milquetoast “we’re not here for revenge” legislature?

      I’m scared they’re planning a coup or a Jan. 6 2.0 massacre.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          Right now it feels like 2012 energy, where they were sure they had systems in place to keep things in check, and now they’re regrouping and lashing out at a few of their own on the way. So get ready and be alert. This didn’t destroy MAGA, it just blindsided them.

            • Rhaedas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 days ago

              If it wasn’t for Obama’s roasting of Trump, we would have gotten a different version of MAGA. That was inevitable. I wonder if we got the better one? What if MAGA had put in place someone more competent, less history, and younger?

              • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Right? That will be the next one though. I think 2028 despite the bullshit. I know, I know, Debbie Doomer, but really look around. It’s been clear for a decade (longer if you pay attention) that there’s like 1.5 political parties in amerikkka, not 2.

                • Rhaedas@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I don’t see it as “both sides” but more too many are willing to lean and protect their own interests, so they don’t agree with a lot from the right, but give into them with lots of excuses. Seems like it’s about the same results, but it’s fixable, unlike if half the left was actually Fedderman clones.

                  To your number - I hope in that viewpoint we have that 0.5, that would be promising for eventual change, as it wasn’t too long ago that having just a few progressive in the House was news.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s a reason Kegsbreath announced an increased military presence in D.C. the day after the elections.

        I firmly believe they’ll just refuse to seat anyone and then deal with the inevitable shit storm that results.

        This isn’t over. Not by a long shot.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Ha ha, her and nancy mace both are one lost election away from thirst trapping old rich maga douches on only fans. Idk if Mace lost, that would be too much to hope for I suppose.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Ha ha, great! Thanks for the info, that cynical bitch making jokes about Matt Gaetz banging underage girls then helps keep the epstein marks hidden.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    At the same time that the entire country said a loud fuck you to maga, only her race was fraud. Fucking joke loser.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sore loser. This disgusting woman would destroy the United States if she could with her fascist nightmare theocratic ideology.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    of course she does. that has been the fall back cry of repuglicans since the first days of trumpitude

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m actually surprised that she’s trying to pull* this BS when not even Trump attempted it this time (which is even more surprising TBF).

  • GloriousGasHole@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was watching 9News with Kyle Clark all night on election night. At no point was she within 1 percentage point on election night. She was down like 3% all night. Not sure how she thinks this is a weird trend, considering now more of the more likely to be Republican voters are trickling in from voting on election day in person.

    At one point, the local correspondant at her election night campaign event pointed out how much fun she was having for someone that was losing the election. She was slamming Busch Lights all night and swing dancing with her boyfriend.

    Kyle Clark pulled out a zinger and said "I’m not sure if I’m really allowed to say this on local news, but we had a saying in college: Boozin’, even if we’re losin’ " 😂

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 days ago

    I hope her campaign can’t afford to pay for a recount. Do you need to put down a deposit or something because I wouldn’t trust them to actually pay at all.

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think when Harris wanted it, it was 2 million? But that’s national, should be much cheaper for a state recount. I doubt her party would give her the money.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      It depends on state and how close the count is. If within a certain margin all states, to my limited knowledge, will allow recounts as I have heard through the years. But if the win is by enough of a percentage the candidate has to pay for it.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Man, we need to forbid conservatives from seeing the results tallied until the final count is determined. Their malformed minds can’t understand why when you continue to count until everything is counted the total number counted at any time will change.