• Senator Collins@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Well there are a lot of these ships going around the world all the time, and very seldom does anything like this happen. I just don’t want people thinking that carriers aren’t safe.

    • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Haha, they are increasing military spending. Showing that reducing the deficit is not the goal at all. They were towing the plane around the flight deck and had some mistake, the tow truck thingy went off the bridge, taking the plane with it. Seems like a design flaw somewhere. Not a big ding to the military, that’s like 0.25% of the available super hornets. Sure is a dumb way to throw a few tens of millions of dollars away, but growing up around the military, I’ve known for decades that the military are great at throwing money out the window.

      • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean nobody got hurt and nothing else seems to have been damaged. If you’re gonna lose a fighter jet I reckon this is about the cheapest way to do it.

      • badbrainstorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I had a retired military buddy at work who told me it was one of his annual task to burn through supply, so they wouldn’t lose funding. I still get amused when I think about him reinacting them spending weeks on end bored AF and snacking, while wasting millions of rounds of ammo, and tossing hand grenades

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’ve heard stories of people burying entire tanks.

          Funny. But also very stupid and wasteful.

            • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              yes, but it’s unrelated. the US could afford all three, but the military protects wealth, while social welfare releases the pressure on ppl to be exploited to generate wealth and health funding lowers the amount of wealth they can siphon off.