The decision to halt production of Tesla’s polarizing polygonal pickup marks the end of an error.

Elon Musk, in a post on X, has officially called time on the Cybertruck, stating that “Tesla will be winding down production of the Cybertruck at Gigafactory Texas around the middle of next year to make room for increased Cybercab production.”

Produced for less than four years, the polarizing pickup is seemingly dying as it lived, with the news being greeted in a flurry of replies in praise of the EV as well as deriding it. James Star, claiming to be a Tesla employee, posted that it was “the saddest news! Cybertruck (was) the best car Tesla sold,” right next to a user called Captain Ford who simply replied to Musk with “Fuck that shitbox.”

  • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I really don’t get it. If Tesla had made a pickup that looked and performed even the slightest bit like normal they would have sold millions of them.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well of course the answer is musk has an ego and a complete lack of any talent. I suspect the board or starting to get sick of him.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nearly impossible to get rid of him.

        Tesla’s bylaws require 66.7% of all outstanding shares to get rid of him. Not just 66.7% of those who vote. Musk alone holds like 13% of common stock, too.

        Index funds and such don’t typically vote to disturb things, but they’d have to here. It would have to be nearly unanimous among everyone other than Musk himself.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Literally could’ve built an electric equivalent to the Ford F-series with four motors and an ungodly amount of torque that nobody needs and sold them for 200k a piece. I’m not in the market for a pickup truck and probably never will be, but if I was and I was looking for electric, I’d buy that over the cyberdump.

      Then if that sells, build a smaller one (a la Ford Ranger) with less power, less size, for less money. Like they did with S and 3, X and Y.

  • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Remember when the shit nazi said the glass was bulletproof and while on stage proceeded to smash said glass with a golf club? This monstrosity should never have seen the light of day.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    And the rest of his cars. The intersection of people who believe in climate change and people who are far right nut jobs has to be vanishingly thin…

  • ᴋɪᴋɪ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The Cybertruck seemed like a bold idea, but it never won over many people. Maybe it’s time for Tesla to focus on products people actually want to buy.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Existing Cybertruck owners will have fun sourcing parts as they break down.

    Me:
    Sarcastically Surprised Kirk Meme

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s gonna be hilarious when they can no longer get parts in 5 years. They’ll still swear to the quality of Tesla though.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            44
            ·
            8 days ago

            Cybertruck purchase agreements prevented re-selling the truck for a year. It was an anti-scalping measure

            Turned out there wasn’t enough demand for the trucks for scalping to be a problem. It was only seen as necessary because of production delays and low production numbers, which probably contributed to apparent demand

            It is a little funny to think about in hindsight. Tesla was worried demand would be so high scalpers would be buying up vehicles to flip, but demand ended up being so low the line had to be stopped within 4 years

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The original delivery agreement for the Foundation Series (initial 1000 built) when they first launched required you to get Tesla’s permission to resell the vehicle for the first year.

            Which is common for limited availability vehicles upon release from basically every manufacturer. The average person is never buying limited edition vehicles so it’s not relevant to 99.9% of the population, and something they’ve never heard of. Ford does it with every limited release Mustang variant for a common example.

            The two primary reasons are essentially to prevent scalping, and so they can guarantee they receive back any vehicles with initial production run issues so engineers can study them. But facts don’t stop media reporting, especially when it comes to headlines about Musk.

            Some manufacturers keep ownership limitations like that in place indefinitely. Ferrari famously sued Deadmau5 because of his Purrari modifications, so he had to remove them and sold the car, replacing it with a Meowclaren instead.

            • egregiousRac@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              He specifically got in trouble for replacing the badge with a prancing cat and the Ferrari name with Purrari: Purrari Rear End

              • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 days ago

                One of the easiest and most common changes people make to their cars is changing or removing badges like that. Can’t with a Ferrari though.

                • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I would say I would never buy a Ferrari (which is true anyway) but I also wouldn’t consider that to even qualify as actual ownership, so even if I did pay for one, I still wouldn’t be willing to call it “buying”.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        It’s got a massive battery pack that can be used for backup power. I’d totally buy one that doesn’t move and put it on blocks in front of my double wide.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 days ago

      There are a lot of unsold Cybertrucks. The only reason so many even sold was because Musk used SpaceX to buy much of the inventory

      If there’s demand for the parts, they’ll be able to get them for a good while

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Lol I never thought about this, but yeah… I never buy anything that doesn’t have both plentiful parts, and videos on how to replace them.

      Neither exist for Cybertrucks. Because their owners are cybercucks. They want to pay others. They’re little bitches. They can’t wait to pay others to fix their shit while they watch.

      Rich little bitch people. That’s who they are.