• raspirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The AI bubble will “burst” as soon as they figure out how to inflict all the damage onto regular working people. The housing bubble bursting is what enabled the ownership class to kick a bunch of working people out of their homes and then buy up all the recently vacated real estate for cheap. Nothing about the damage that the rich did to our economy caused any of them to face any actual consequences.

    The promise of AI was that it would replace all the workers, but it’s not doing that fast enough and it’s beginning to look like it never will. We’ve been hearing that the AI bubble will “burst any day now” for years at this point, but if it happened right now, the ownership class are the ones who would be left holding the bag, and that can’t be allowed to happen. When they find a way to take it out of our hides, we’ll see that suddenly the “invisible hand of the free market” will present a scenario such that the floodgates open and the bloodbath is finally allowed to proceed. I imagine that’s why they started wrapping up so many pension funds and the like in AI investments.

    • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They already have. Public Banks are huge investors in the private credit companies that underpin a good amount of the AI bubble.

      The Magnificent 7 have been driving the stock markets gains for the last few years. They have also created independent companies to build out the data centers. The debt for these companies is off their books and funded primarily by private credit markets and is underpinned by contracts with the big 7 for data processing once the data center is built.

      Projections by the Mag 7 have driven their share increase. So what happens if one or two of the magnificent 7 miss their projections? Well look at Oracle, its stock is tanking because it missed projections.

      If the Mag. 7 stock tanks so will your 401ks. When their stock is worth less they will stop plowing money into AI. Suddenly all of the companies with contracts to build the data centers will loose their source of revenue. No revenue and they can’t pay off the loans to private credit. Private credit companies will start to go under and begin to take down the public banking companies that invested in them…

      Its a house of cards ready to fall if any of the Mag 7 start to flounder.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        It’s a good time to learn about what investments are in your 401k if you have any. You can look at the data sheets on the investments to see what stocks the index funds are made of. I’m moving mine to International index funds that are not tech heavy. I’m no expert in investing but I have heard that it’s sound to invest in companies that make basic things that people need.

    • BionicBeaver3000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The “invisible hand of the market” is such a fascinating myth, because it frames the results of capitalist endeavors as inevitable and almost holy - but as soon as the sufficiently wealthy and well-connected suffer a setback, then “government bailouts” are granted.

      The invisible hand is actually very visible of you dare to look close enough.

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The basic supply & demand, “invisible hand of the market” stuff applies at like. A farmer’s market. This is the context Adam Smith was talking about when he made up the invisible hand phrase. If one farmer has cheaper produce than another, he’ll probably get more customers. Anything more complicated than a local farmer’s market is… more complicated.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      ownership class

      pension funds

      Same thing. Pension funds ARE the ownership class.

      I’ve been commenting that people over 55 own 52% of the US and baby boomers as a generation own ~8x more than billionaires as a class, but I re-checked and I’d quoted the wrong number in a bunch of my comments. 52% is for baby boomers only. All over 55s added together are actually over 70%. Let that sink in.

      The entire goal of the economy is to let old people enjoy the spoils of the young’s work. Even billionaires are just a symptom of a larger, systemic issue (which is not to say they shouldn’t be hunted for sport, that should still happen).

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So I saw a few relevant newspieces:

    ~ Companies are now ceasing their mandate to workers to use AI to do things that used to be done without AI. They’re now saying don’t use AI just to use AI. They’re trying to reduce their token purchases.

    ~ The estimation now for AI use cases is to reconsider if tokens cost ten times their current price. If the use case is still worth it, then that use case will likely survive the bubble. If it’s not worth it, it’s time to hire back employees.

    ~ The hyperscale AI industry will have to make $6 trillion annually to break even. Amazon makes $2 trillion by selling people material stuff. Walmart is similar. There may not be a market for $6 trillion in tokens every year, even from government projects. Also, it’s a bad sign if government projects are propping up the whole stock market.

    ~ China is mostly turning to a software AI model which does home and small business AI tasks fairly well without buying compute from a hyperscaler. You get a gaming machine, get open source AI software and a dozen terabytes of training data, and you should be able to create slop, vibe code or fix the grammar and style of your report. Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don’t like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn’t have those objections.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Some companies already run Chairman Xi’s big models on-prem and do not limit token usage on those.

    • AAA@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don’t like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn’t have those objections.

      Unless you create or review the training data and train your model yourself, home grown AI models do have those objections.

    • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      An investment that would pay off if the tech industry went to hell would be Put options on QQQ (an ETF that tracks the NASDAQ-100). You have to get both the timing and the drop correct, and better funded groups with much faster computers AND the ability to make trades to prop up the market while they unload their shit will be competing against you (every options trade has an opposite side and most of them expire worthless). Watch the movies Margin Call and The Big Short for research as much as playing the lottery can be researched (they’re good movies so it’s time well spent anyway). Make a movie night out of it and watch The Other Guys which was directed by the same guy who directed The Big Short. Watch through the end credits.

      I didn’t read the article because gizmodo, but as other people here have said, Dr. Burry (he’s played by Christian Bale in The Big Short) often thinks things are going to go south, and there’s usually reason to think so, but in general as Warren Buffett could easily have said, “stonks only go up.” NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT make around 15% or so of the entire world stock market and around 20% of the US market. Nobody’s going to let them collapse and even without the AI craze they still have all the other stuff to fall back on. Thumbs will go on the scale to an extent even greater than the 2008 collapse.

  • Kcap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I own a beer bar, and we work with some friends who have a catering business that does pop ups on our patio. They’ve been using AI to generate flyers and then tag us to have us share them to our larger audience. I stopped doing it because they look like trash, get low engagement, and are off brand for our art-inspired space. They got upset with me that we weren’t helping promote, and I explained my position on their AI flyers, and they sent a very lengthy email back about how AI is being utilized by small businesses in ways that we’re still scratching the surface to understand its value. I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol. Now I have more work on my hands to design their flyers for them, but it’s worth it.

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I recently read a decent article (in Danish mind you), focused on the positions some volunteers had from getting more fans to their local football club… Because they now posted stuff on Facebook.

      Then followed up by an expert on engagement, and statistics on about half the population felt AI image generations to be off putting - And a fair chunk of the remainder not really caring, and a small minority finding it cool/useful.

      That experts main position, was the human touch was lost and the volunteer of the local football club would most likely get more people to stadium if they asked a bunch of 2nd graders to draw match day posts.

      Because it would genuinely connect to people. So yeah, a lot of smaller businesses and volunteers are currently having a feeling all of this AI gen is giving them more traffic and attention, but in reality they’re getting more attention because they went from doing nothing to doing something

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Typically, one expects a “bar” to have beer and liquor and the ability to make at least basic mixed drinks (rum and Coke, gin and tonic, etc.).

        A “beer bar” usually has a wider variety of beers on draft and no liquor or mixed drinks.

        • octobob@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Damn you could just have a lot of beers and liquor as well, sounds gimmicky

          • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Some places have different licensing costs and requirements for places that serve beer and wine only vs also serving spirits.

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The amount of food menus with it on is ridiculous. If you sell food you want it to look good, appetizing etc, so making it look like plastic tat is counter effective.

      Second I immediately think they either don’t care or are uninterested in their product. That makes me question how much they care about their food, safety quality taste etc. It’s an immediate no for me.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I popped the email into chatgpt and asked if it wrote that email and it said it did, lol

      It doesn’t work that way tho

      • Kcap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean, it literally does though. The email sounded phony AF, especially knowing that the person’s first language isn’t English and it was overly proper sounding. I copy and pasted it into chatgpt and said “did you write this email?“ and it’s response was” yes, based on the writing style and phrasing, I wrote this content."

          • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It doesn’t remember but that won’t keep it from answering a question as to whether it thinks an email was AI generated. It’ll also be happy to confidently answer a question with a wrong answer to.

        • Reality@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Someone put in the intro to the book Frankenstein into an ai checker and it confirmed it to be 100 percent written by an LLM. It’s not deterministic.

          • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s not deterministic.

            This is the first thing about LLMs always, and what most people can’t seem to understand.

            LLMs are a thing where you give an input and get an output, and it happens to correspond to reality much of the time. But there’s no actual understanding there.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’ve been using ChatGPT a bit at work lately, since they’ve already paid for the subscription for everyone. I’ve learned that it is a bad idea to ask it any leading question, because it is likely to just give you the answer you want to hear.

        • kinship@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Doesn’t work that way. Only if they programmed LLMs to sign the work like using a hash you would be able to confirm or deny with 100% accuracy

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 hours ago

      A usual ramen spot I’ve been going to for the past few years for some reason replaced the old images of the food on their menu with AI-gen ones and it looked so weird. I saw it last time I went for my usual, but I kept looking at the art and like a Lovecraftian horror the longer I looked at it the worse the details appeared. It literally affected my appetite because psychologically I couldn’t help but think I was ordering some freak-ass food as depicted in the new ai-gen pictures, and the ramen just didn’t taste as good to me that day. And I don’t think I’ll go back anymore :(

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      16 hours ago

      it’s so bizarre to me that people who work with food don’t realize that the ai trash is producing images that are REVOLTING, do not look like food, and actively deter people from their products.

      you’d be better off with a half lit shitty polaroid of actual food than putting that trash on your branding, so much of it is nightmare fuel

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I used to work in a wine store. Customers would always joke “hahaha i just pick them by the label 😂” and I would always say. That’s not stupid, wine is about aesthetics. Someone who makes good wine will appreciate the value of a good label. And the inverse is true, people with poor taste won’t care about their label, but they won’t be able to make good wine, either.

        I’m saying judge a book by its cover. How else are you gonna know what’s in the book without looking at its cover??

      • Kcap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You’re definitely right, the food looks so phony. The thing that’s wild is half the time they make a flyer, there’s only bricks of yellow text on a black background that’s too much info to read. I’m visiting San Francisco right now and saw a pizza shop last night that their entire menu was AI garbage and was so shocked how prevalent it’s become.

  • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I had a boomer normie ask me how to use AI to develop his new “business” website telling me that he didn’t want to hire a developer if the developer would just use AI anyway.

    This guy doesn’t know what a router is, and was asking me for help trying to understand what the AI was telling him, and it was the most basic shit.

    When the normies are trying to invest in AI, they’re the last to invest and know to throw money at it. That was a big signal to me that the bubble is about to pop. Money is running out and the boomers are trying to get in on it.

    • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Why would someone ask a person to explain an AI response they didn’t understand? Like, you’ve already offloaded the most important part from a human brain (getting a fucking answer)… Why wouldn’t you at least then ASK THE AI TO REPHRASE AND SUMMARIZE the response you didn’t understand? That’s the thing it’s actually good at doing ffs.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Exactly this. If you hear people talking about investments around the Thanksgiving table, its time to bail. All the smart people got in months ago and have left, they are just looking for bag holders now.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 hours ago

      When the normies are trying to invest in AI, they’re the last to invest and know to throw money at it

      They are also the largest group by far. Doesn’t really mean much aside from the fact that adoption is now widespread.

      • aceshigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s the right strategy. They want to use ai, so let them. No need to speak to professionals who will use ai anyway.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Oh, great, thanks! You’re a real lifesaver. [Proceeds to pay more than he would have paid for the real developer, to spend more time to create vibe-coded tech-illiterate trash.]

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And not just about AI. Ever since the movie, I keep seeing posts about what this guy is betting on. I think some of it is news companies preying on poor people for clicks.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    OpenAI had their little failure of a presentation recently, and they’re introducing a “fast response” tier for 6x the current subscription cost. This is their attempt to get people used to higher pricing. They are bleeding money, and they will need to raise prices sooner than later to start attempting to make it back.

    Once they do, a good chunk of their customers will simply stop paying, forcing the AI companies to further raise prices, causing more customers to leave, etc.

    AI companies are trying (and failing) to be indispensable, and they need that to have any hope of survival. It’s only a matter of time before they collapse, and only then might we see what’s actually beneficial about machine learning.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So do I. We had our financial person take steps to limit our exposure. Still, I expect we’ll take a major hit regardless. Hopefully, we can ride it out with no major financial emergency forcing us to sell while the market is down.

    • Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve come to realize that I was assuming that there was a limit somewhere to “the market staying irrational”. I’m not so sure anymore

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You could argue that a heavily debt-based business that requires years and years of more debt before becoming profitable would respond to rising interest rates quite negatively, but, yeah, the whole thing is already enitrely irrational.

        I’m keeping some popcorn in reserve for OpenAI’s IPO.

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But the question is whether or not they’re actively holding debt or just letting themselves get diluted through investments.

          There’s more supply than demand for compute at the moment, so Microsoft is more than happy to buy ownership through Azure credits - Likewise Amazon is with AWS credits

        • No1@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I don’t get why they haven’t gone already.

          If they don’t get their IPO off before the bubble pops, they might be losing out on a trillion with a capital T

          • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Because there is no way he gets 1 Trillion in an IPO the moment their finances become public, and that is the bare minimum he needs so he doesn’t get ripped to shreds.

            • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              And we already know they’re due to run completely out of money sometime in 2027. And getting more users only increases their expenses, with no real path to profitability in sight

              • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                That’s why i postulate that they will be bailed out, for the simple reason that the US military and 3-letter-agencies do not care if you can make money with this tech. They care about the amount of control it gives them.

                If they get bailed out it means that the Military-Industrial complex has it’s fingers so deep in OpenAI and Anthropic that they wear them like a glove.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            16 hours ago
            1. They are true believers
            2. They know they’ll get a bail out because they are too big to fail
      • inari@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s less about fundamentals and more about what investors believe about the market. That’s why Musk is so good at manipulating the market, he’s convincing enough for many investors.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    He may not be far off.

    These bubbles usually last approximately five years. (Or at least that’s been the case historically.) We’re in year four. I’m actually keeping a portion of my portfolio in cash so when the crash comes I can take advantage, though I may move my whole retirement account into bonds and money market funds after the new year.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Trump just said in a response to a question about our $40 trillion debt (jesus, that’s a lot of zeroes), “You know, inflation, certain levels of inflation, will also pay off that debt very rapidly. Very rapidly.” https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-just-soft-launched-higher-inflation-as-the-new-solution-for-rebalancing-the-40-trillion-us-national-debt/ar-AA2dpocG

      So I hope that cash isn’t USD. Honestly, all currencies look pretty bad right now. And if Trump triggers Iran into destroying the Middle East (and maybe triggering Israel to nuke, if Trump hasn’t already), the only thing that’s going to be worth a damn is cigarettes and penicillin.

      • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Astonishing really.

        This is the guy running the US like a business.

        Don’t worry about debt, just stoke up inflation so it does t seem like so much money.

        Nothing could possibly go wrong with this plan.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The “he’s a businessman and he’s going to run the government like he runs a business” argument is as stupid as it was prescient.

      • Arancello@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Apparently this was covered in an article in Fortune magazine. in it they state trump called it a ‘soft default’ on usa debt.

        This is basically not paying debts. it’s consistent with trump practices. Afterall, didnt he bankrupt 40 companies including 6 casinos? he’s just moving on to bigger fish by bankrupting the usa now.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The AI bubble is propping up the American bond market too (countering all of the other crap Trump had been doing to undermine the economy). When the bubble pops, the bond market is going to suffer massively as well.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You’re not wrong. I’m thinking of buying in post-bubble potentially, but I’m not 100% sure what I’ll do yet. I do know that, by the day, it feels more and more like a good time to take the profit that’s there and wait.

      • eyesaremosaics@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Do you mean long term bonds or do you think short term will be affected as well? If it is a riding rate environment then t-bills or MMFs probably have more to gain from the rising rates than risks from a drop in value of held bonds

      • VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You could reallocate into bonds if you believe that it will tank the equity market as a whole. Most available options to allocate into a pretty broad so it’s not totally exposed, just expect lower returns in the mean time and be prepared to reallocate into more growth exposure if/when the broader crash happens. Difficult to time so beware.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Bonds are a bad call as well, as the US government is screwed on interest and will be inflating.

          Gold is a better call, this looks like stagflation coming.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah, but if the bubble lasts longer it’ll hurt us more when it does collapse.

        Plus we’ll have to deal with more clanker bullshit in more of our daily lives for longer if it takes a long time for it to collapse.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Are you talking about the collapse of the AI bubble hurting us? I mean, sure, but what’s the alternative? There isn’t one. The sooner it pops, the more money that will be available to develop businesses that can grow the economy. Right AI is gobbling up investment capital and driving up the interest rates and inflation of the price of tech hw is stunting consumer and business tech, contributing to overall inflation, and making actual products people want to buy more expensive, ie less sold…

        I’d like to say that this economic collapse could not have come at a worse time, but I think bubbles like this are only possible when markets are no longer competitive, everyone is broke as shit, and people have to invent fantasies to make investors think line will go up.

        Edit: Oh, and I just thought of a REALLY big benefit of an early pop: people’s retirements will be less exposed to AI-first and AI-only companies which are almost guaranteed to fail. If OpenAI raises 2 trillion, it’s going to be getting a lot of that from institutional investors investing other people’s money.