Imagine actually thinking MSNBC is left. Scamper back off to Reddit now.

Also, Lemmy was founded and is run by communists. Lol

Bernie is center-left at most. If he’s too left, you don’t lean left at all. If he’s not left enough, that makes sense.

Lol, good one mate

I can tell you never worked in safety or really gave this any thought.

Removed by mod

“I’ve never heard about it, so clearly it’s not a problem”.

Just because you’re ignorant doesn’t mean it’s not dangerous. People like you are exactly why we have laws like this - you’re not bright enough to understand why it’s a bad idea, so we have laws to protect the rest of us from your stupidity.

Ahhh yes, the magical PPE that never fails.

Vance would streams himself inside a couch.

FTFY. On Onlyfans.

Fucking spot on.

If you go to a United States prison, all of the electronics are clear!

Mrrrmmm, ACKchyually, she’s over 15 so it’s EPHEBOphilia. They’re two very different things, thank you very much.

/s, kiddie diddling is kiddie diddling.

Anyone unironically using any variation of “I’m just telling it how it is” is generally an idiot. You don’t disprove that trend.

Did you suddenly stop taking your meds?

If you’re anywhere north of 10 years old, you still have a lot of growing up to do. Thanks for showing me exactly what kind of person you are and I hope you have a day that is just as wonderful as you are.

Hold on here. Was it that you knew it wouldn’t translate well in text or was it that we’d need to use our brains but didn’t? Because you seem to change your story so that you can blame everyone else for misunderstanding because you were vague.

It’s funny you call us Redditors: I’m engaging with you (and increasingly regretting it) instead of just downvoting and moving on, while you’re blaming others instead of owning up to your actions. Which exactly is classic Reddit behavior?

You made a comment you knew wouldn’t translate well to text and didn’t try to make sure others would understand your intent. Someone took it seriously, so your response is “knew someone would get all hurt by it though” instead of owning up to it.

I have this wild suggestion for it. Don’t write ambiguous messages. If you do and it confuses or offends someone, explain or apologize instead of being a wanker and pretending the other people are the problem. You’re the problem here, mate.

This is a perfectly acceptable question in a science course. Just because you don’t have the experience, knowledge, or, barring those two, even just the imagination to understand how a question might apply doesn’t make it strange or dumb. It does speak volumes about you, though.

That just makes me wank harder.

You’re not one for self awareness or rational discourse, are you? Comment thread summary up to this point:

Them: Initial claim
You: Deflection - responds with counter-argument instead of addressing original claim
Them: Objection to textbook deflection
You: Claim - their objection to your deflection is the real deflection

This is what happens when you learn to argue from television.

Do you mean X, formerly Twitter? I had trouble hearing you with Elon’s dick in your mouth.