Tea Party(2010s or so) is when they started going anti-science. They’ve always been pro Christian though, so it’s a fuzzy line.
I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
Tea Party(2010s or so) is when they started going anti-science. They’ve always been pro Christian though, so it’s a fuzzy line.
Sorry again, locking this thread because it’s becoming weird.
Have you heard of “sexy indifference”? A relative of mine mentioned it. It kind of makes sense. If you don’t seem desperate or greedy for a relationship, you’ll be more fun to be around and won’t care as much either, because you have your own thing going on.
The shots didn’t get anywhere near him, he is not a victim. Maybe all of the R’s can now go to golf clubs in solidarity with him. It would be way better than wearing a maxipad on their ears.
My bad, sorry about that. I picked up the wrong one. I fixed the link.
Here is the contrast, a video of Tim Walz.
As detailed in the complaint, the defendants’ alleged scheme has three main components. First, an agreement to fix the price of peer review services at zero that includes an agreement to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the defendants’ preeminent journals.
Second, the publisher defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time, which substantially reduces competition by removing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly.
Third, the publisher defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year. As the complaint notes, “From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendant grants permission. Moreover, when the Publisher
I found it really entertaining if you like someone skillfully tearing someone apart. She let herself and trump get comfortable and then she stabbed him over and over with her words. She said things we’ve all wanted to say while using a lot of his terms. This was a masterclass. She stumbled maybe 2x in front of a psychopath, I thought it was pretty good.
Here’s the CSPAN link: https://www.c-span.org/video/?538053-1/simulcast-abc-news-presidential-debate
You can still watch it on CSPAN if you want to. I was glad I went back and watched its entirety because watching her skill at taking him down was something. The first 10 minutes are kind of scary, he seemed normal and accessible. Then she started her campaign.
They did ask, Trump talked over the mods. I can’t find a clip of the entire exchange, but the mod asked later as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5qoaj3YndQ
I think that’s an honest mistake. She was awarded the Women’s Grandmaster title and the International Master which is confusing unless you look at the standards. It’s arguably a world title holder? Maybe? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorsa_Derakhshani
Sorry, gotta lock it. The drama is intensifying.
I shouldn’t do this too early, sorry about that. Total fuck up on my part.
How bad was it that the DOJ had to be involved?
Oh…
deleted by creator
I’m guessing you do subscribed as well. I’ve also found it kind of nice to be able to leave and get on with my day. Reddit used to suck me in.
Are you checking for hot, 6 hours and 12 hours? I think it defaults to active which does make it seem, ironically, less active.
Why would that upset you? It looks like they’re both made up. One was the Christ child and the other was Saint Nicklaus (Santa Klaus). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christkind
Here is the Trump/Harris debate. They won’t let me copy the clip, so choose abortion on the side if you want to hear both of their answers.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?538053-1/simulcast-abc-news-presidential-debate