Did… did I just slide to a parallel universe? Do I get to meet Jerry O’Connell? What the hell is going on?!

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    People realize that he’s just a propagandist saving face by playing both sides and now playing with the short attention span and memory of the idiots on the other side, right?

  • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m wondering if we’re in the process of seeing the parties flip tbh. It seems like D’s are becoming more conservative and R’s are now trying to make systemic changes. Granted it’s not a perfect flip and R-progressiveness is more like going backwards at times (abortion) but things feel weird now.

    • D: Trying to maintain (aka conserve) the status quo. Haven’t been truly progressive for decades. Doesn’t seem to have learned anything from losing in 2024.
    • R: Got suddenly forced into populism by Trump’s surprise win and staying power. Their status quo rich politicians are all being forced out. “Anti-Elites” and big chaotic changes are now their calling cards.

    If R’s realize that voters will strongly support them for attacking the rich, it might happen imo.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Trump took over GOP. It’s not the same party as before.

        Tariffs and deporting millions of people are both quite radical changes of the status quo. Illegals have been a fundamental part of our labor market for decades. GOP historically has been pro-illegal immigrants even if they’ve kept mostly quiet about it. It’s good for business. Reagan, the GOP quasi-religious symbol, legalized millions of illegals.

        Tariffs fly in the face of established free market capitalism economics. Milton Friedman would be turning in his grave. You are artificially repressing the market through strong government regulation. Again, a radical reshaping of American policy.

        I think Trump actually has a short window of action for very dramatic change. For example, if he comes out and says he believes we need universal healthcare because of the corrupt elites and whatnot, I think people will rally behind him. His popularity would jump up 20 points overnight. I think his voters are actually expecting some type of radical change.

        The country is hurting and when people elect populists, it means they’re at the end of their ropes. Some of the class consciousness needs to be released with a pressure valve otherwise we’re headed for some murky and potentially ugly consequences.

        People like Bannon understand this. I think they see the way the winds are blowing and want to be in a position to benefit

        • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump took over GOP. It’s not the same party as before.

          yeah it is; it’s still the same party of billionaires and tax cuts

          Tariffs and deporting millions of people are both quite radical changes of the status quo.

          lol what? tariffs and protectionism have been the policies of the republican party and conservatism forever

          . For example, if he comes out and says he believes we need universal healthcare because of the corrupt elites and whatnot

          And I have a bridge to sell you

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            lol what? tariffs and protectionism have been the policies of the republican party and conservatism forever

            since Reagan it’s been the party of pro-business and free market capitalism. it wasn’t until the right wind populism that slowly started during the tea party and eventually led to Trump that we started seeing protectionism

            And I have a bridge to sell you

            I’m not claiming he is going to do this, I’m saying I think he has an opportunity to do it. The fundamental question is what Trump has in mind. Is his goal to just extract as much money as possible for him and his friends while keeping everything else more or less the same? Or does he have a more radical vision?

            Certain individuals connected with the new Trump administration (looking at Vance and his financier Peter Thiel) have some radical beliefs in a new sort of technocratic authoritarian state. If this is really their goal, I think universal healthcare is a useful stepping stone to popular support for more radical items.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Republicans do want to change the system, but only in ways that make it easier for the already wealthy to extract even more money from the rest of the country, and do it faster.

        Imagine how rich a small number of people can get if those pesky consumer protection and environmental regulations are tossed in the trash.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      One key thing is that the Republican party has very much now become the party of the working class. In 2024, Kamala won those making less than $30k, and more than $100k. She won the poor and the professional class, but Trump won the working class, (and I assume) the extremely wealthy.

      The Democrat’s real base right now is the professional class. Those with college degrees working white collar jobs. The poor also vote more for Dems, but they vote in fewer numbers based both on their poverty and their lower than average age.

      We always assumed it was the rich vs everyone else, but it need not be that way. It could easily turn out to be the rich and the working class vs. the professional class and the poor. When someone like Bannon suggests raising taxes on the “rich,” he may not mean the actual ultra-wealthy, but the professional class.

      And there is a form of taxation that could be implemented to fall on the professional class the hardest - targeting the tax advantages of 401ks and IRAs. That seems the most obvious target. Just raising income taxes would have to also hit the rich, but taking away a lot of the tax benefits of retirement accounts would mostly hurt the professional class, the white collar workers with bachelors and graduate degrees. The doctors, the lawyers, the engineers, the college professors, etc. The truly wealthy don’t really rely on these accounts much, as they have limits on them that make them useless for storing tens of millions or more in. And the working class? Well if you have a household income of $60k, odds are pretty low you’re going to be maxing out your 401k contribution.

      The retirement accounts seem the most likely targets of this. The poor and working class don’t usually make enough to put substantial money away in these accounts, while their asset protections are a rounding error to the wealthy. Raiding 401ks and IRAs would be a way for them to raise taxes in a way that zeros in on the Democratic electorate and hurts them the most.

      We could even see a very weird political landscape where 401ks and IRAs were raided to pay for social programs like health insurance subsidies, expanded subsidies for new parents, subsidized daycare, and other social spending meant to increase birth rates. They would sell it as “raising taxes on the wealthy to give to the working class,” while they would really be raising taxes on the professional class to pay for subsidies for the working class and tax cuts for the wealthy.

      The white collar college educated workers are the heart of the Democrat’s current power base. They are the most likely targets of any Republican tax increases “on the rich.” And the easiest way to raise taxes on the professional class without also taxing the wealthy is to come after the retirement accounts.

      And while some might say, “that would never happen, people wouldn’t stand for it. It would be the government going back on its word, people would be infuriated!” Well, I just come back to the end of Roe v. Wade. Republicans stripped civil rights from half the country, and the electorate responded by giving them full control of government. If you can strip the civil rights from half the population, stripping retirement account benefits, which far fewer people are actually able to really take advantage of, is minor in comparison.

      401k and IRA protections are just tax policy. They can be changed at any time. A law could be passed tomorrow that said, “401k accounts are being wound down. All 401k accounts must be liquidated within the next five years and transferred to regular taxable brokerage accounts. This liquidation will be taxed like any other 401k or IRA withdrawal.” Then, everyone has to liquidate their accounts, and the full balance would be taxed as regular income. Not only would this give the government more long term revenue, but it would represent a massive short-term windfall. The treasury would bring in trillions as the government effectively seizes 20-30% of every 401k account in the nation. It would be a temporary windfall, but in the years of this one-time liquidation, it would likely even allow Trump to claim he actually balanced the budget. Anyone with sense would know it was a short-term stunt, but his base isn’t known for having a lot of sense.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          They also need to be careful with selection bias. He didn’t significantly change his numbers, the blocks she engaged successfully still voted less.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bannon is the cackling villain.

      He knows the system is fucked. He knows he’s fucked. He knows you know it’s fucked and there’s no reason to hide anything.

      If Starscream slicked his hair back and had a thing for Johnny Cash’s wardrobe, you’d have something close to Bannon.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Bannon always looks at the camera with this “lmfao, can you believe this shit?” look on his face.

          No, man. I can’t!

          I really can’t!

      • logos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        …some men aren’t looking for anything logical, like money. They can’t be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right

    Guys, he’s not talking about the re-alignment in America in 1932…

  • Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bannon is an anger salesmen. Anger salesmen don’t sell you somene else’s anger, though – they can’t. Instead, they package up your own anger, and sell it back to you.

    Bannon sees the the reaction people are habing to CEOs right now, slapping a big ol’ bow on it, and selling it back to people.

  • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This reminds me of a manifesto I was reading for a proposed proletarian-run state. Comes from early 1900s, before the world went to shit because of the rise of fadcism. Particularly a few key points from their 25-point plan stood out to me:

    1. Abolition of unearned incomes [passive income, in today’s terms]. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery.
    1. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice of life and property that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment due to a war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. Therefore, we demand ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
    1. We demand nationalization of all businesses which have been up to the present formed into companies (trusts).
    1. We demand that the profits from wholesale trade shall be shared out.
    1. We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
    1. We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
    1. We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of land rent and prevention of all speculation in land.
    1. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

    […]

    1. The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious citizen to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. […] We demand the education at the expense of the state of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
    1. The state is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, […]

    Oops, wait, that’s excerpted from The National Socialist Program

    Yeah, it turns out Nazis have always been willing to use socialist rhetoric to appeal to the working class. They know what they’re doing, but it’s only a matter of time before what’s determined to be for “the good of the workers” is coincidentally aligned with genocide and war and the greed of the ruling class…

    TL;DR Nazis were always on board with taxing the rich… Until they didn’t have any more competition, at which point it’s back to oligarchy (and genocide, lots and lots of genocide).

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Except in the US it will be the corporations calling the shots. In Nazi Germany the corporations got whatever they wanted as long as they were in-line with the government. Otherwise the government would take over. In the US that wouldn’t happen.

      Edit: I find it rich that they wanted to outlaw child labor when they literally sent children to fight in the front lines. As young as 10 fucking years old.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I was wondering with a few of those. Particularly number 18 is dropping fucking anvil sized hints. And knowing what to look for the rest fall neatly into line with their position against reparations and American government loans; their stance on veteran’s care; and their conspiracy that corporations cost them world war 1, (this handily turned into Jews the second they needed corporate money).

      So yeah I guess what I’m saying is you should definitely look the gift horse in the mouth. I learned this lesson as a kid in the 90’s watching Newt Gingrich talk about how we need to do more to help poverty stricken and homeless children. I was nodding right along and then he got to his solution, workhouses. He even used an updated “Dignity of Work” line about how they’ll learn useful skills and be proud of themselves.

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why are you reading Nazi manifestos? Most of those bullet points look terrible either way though.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because I believe in learning from the past, and not making information forbidden either formally via regulations, nor informally via social pressures.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    "This is a 1932-type realignment, if we do this right,” Bannon explained. “Look at the demographics that got us here – black, Hispanic, white, working class, all of it. If we deliver for these people, and I mean deliver in a big way economically, then this is a coalition that could last for 50 years.”

    He added that loyalty to “crony capitalism” and “tax breaks for the corporations” could “squander” a unique moment in history.

    Making the economy better is how Hitler got into power too. The irony in saying this could be a 1932 style realignment is not lost on me. Trump has also said he wants to go after his political opponents and put them in prison. Also something Hitler did.

    • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      3 days ago

      To expand on this for the unaware: Hitler came back into power for his second term in 1932. His first term, similar to trumps, was rife with turmoil and political/administrative blunders. One of the first things he did, upon returning to power, was a German version of The New Deal. They massively invested in their country’s infrastructure and provided tens of millions of jobs for the young working class, who had been suffering the worst unemployment crisis in an age. For the first time in their lives, young Germans had good jobs (with great benefits) and were contributing towards building a better, cleaner, safer Germany, all facilitated by “the national socialist party”. This was the part of nazi history that actually included socialism, and it’s how the nazi party duped an entire generation into becoming their foot soldiers. They actually delivered substantive, positive change for the people, allowed people to get comfortable with the new status quo while they further built propaganda machines, then turned that status quo into a carrot on a stick. Young nazi’s were very fearful of a backslide, so when nazi propaganda started saying all these bad people were trying to take away their newfound financial freedom, it was very easy to convince these young, relatively ignorant, working class people to “defend” the country they proudly built with their own hands.

      If the GOP did a 180° on all of their economic policy, of the last 60+ years, to follow a similar story arc, I would be extremely concerned. With how down-trodden our 3 youngest generations are, the conditions for an American copy of nazi Germany couldn’t be more perfect than they are right now.

      I’m not a historian. I just read a book on this subject recently. Feel free to correct or add to anything I got wrong/missed!

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If they flipped on their last 60 years of policy though… I’d be much happier with the status quo though. A new new deal and a thriving economy that helps the working class would be great. It would give far fewer issues that we need to address at once. Shit, if you got them flipped, since Republicans tend to fall in line they’ll take it as a win and celebrate it as they believed he would be good the entire time ignoring all of his policies changing. And it lands the Republicans left of the Democrats. Meaning when the Democrats lean towards the pubs to get voters … they’ll be moving left as well. If we somehow got healthcare and fair wages and taxation better through this… Then we only have to focus on ensuring they don’t subjugate populations like minorities, and get policing under control which all would be easier with a thriving economy and workforce. Less people are scared when more people are doing well. Whether someone is racist or not, the stereotypes become harder to push on people. A few other huge things like climate change, but with high taxes on the rich pushes companies to invest their money into their companies to avoid paying those taxes which in turn will churn out good things. (Either more quality, efficiency, research and expansion). Maybe we could finally catch up on battery tech and secure our own energy sources and grid for the future. That would be a great way to put America to work. Building an upgraded grid with storage and modularity for natural disasters.

        Don’t get my hopes up on this shit just to

        • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          While I generally agree, I would still be extremely skeptical of those changes coming from the people that have spent the last 60 years sliding us into a situation were we desperately need those changes. If that was the play, I would see it as a decades long scam with the intent being to purchase legitimacy with a lie. The logical conclusion being they want absolute power and see a working strategy to obtain that by following in the nazi’s footsteps, with some modern revisions.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Skeptical is understandable. But we can use some wins man… if the winds blowing in the right direction better to veer the ship in the right direction than try to go agaisnt it while hurting and tiring ourselves out in the process.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The difference being that the Nazis were often competent people, and there was not the same massive base of crony capitalism with its fingers firmly enmeshed around every single area of government like there is in the US currently.

        I won’t say it’s impossible, and I think they might be able to leverage social media to construct the exact same mass movement of loyal followers with the exact same horrifying results, but I don’t think the type of economic populism that did it for the Reich is feasible for the MAGA people to pull off. Definitely not with Trump at the helm.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            I mean, they took over the country and then more than half of Europe. Hitler fought in the infantry and wrote a whole book. I’m not saying they were geniuses and some parts were a pure clown show, especially after Hitler took over for real, but Trump literally just shuffles around shitting in his pants and doing whatever the last person who talked to him convinced him is a good idea.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      And just like that, Steve Bannon learned about all the structures of liberal democracy that have thus far been stopping crony capitalism from squishing him like a worm on the sidewalk.

      There’s a reason he isn’t hosting his little podcast in Russia or Algeria. He’s not 1% of strong enough to survive without the cushy protection afforded to white men in America who are broadly aligned with the rich people.

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thank you, this is the real lesson to take away from this, not some bass-ackwards universe shift again.

      Edit: Stray thought about this again, this is why right wing populism is both effective at getting elected and devastating on countries as it shifts to fascism. Appeal to the masses while conspiring to retain power and increase wealth accumulation at the top.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      None of this matters. Bannon is still useful to the media when they want a headline but he doesn’t have enough influence with Trump to actually action anything like this anyways. Trump’s cabinet is nothing but billionaires lol.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        One would like to think so. The problem is that imagining a right-wing Republican willing to jackboot some motherfuckers is easy; imagining one who wants to out-FDR FDR? Come on.

        • olympicyes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          FDR wasn’t the champion of civil rights but he did fix the primary economic problems of the US during the depression. I personally don’t trust Bannon either but he’s clearly comparing to FDR not Hitler.

            • Microw@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              Bannon is from a catholic Irish family, his parents absolutely admired JFK. The whole reason why Bannon founded Breitbart was to propagandize an alternative right (alt right) to the elitist GOP. This does add up for him personally. Would Trump’s party do any of this though? Of course not.

            • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, really. I mean, there was an entire plot to assassinate FDR called the Business Plot and they counted on literally a retired general to help them pull it off, who they were going to install as a dictator. A year later the general testified against his fellow conspirators before a House committee. Nobody was actually prosecuted (huge mistake, IMO), but the final report said, “there is no question that these attempts were discussed, were planned, and might have been placed in execution when and if the financial backers deemed it expedient.”

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ll tell you wants going on. He is saying the quiet part out loud.

    He is admitting that conservatives have always known what would make the country better but refused to admit it, instead have always played “dumb” by claiming their free market and deregulation approach is what they honestly believe is best for the country.

    I might be reading too much into it but imo this shows that decades of democrats playing fair and true to the process is why we got here. Because selfish people realized that they can take advantage of the benefit of the doubt and just ruin the government while pretending they don’t know any better.

    Pretty evil, more than I actually expected from him tbh.