• BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      For a month? It’s just dried shredded leaves wrapped in paper, cigarettes are super cheap to produce, tax makes them expensive.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      You didn’t live in the eighties I bet. It was cheap back then and everyone smoked.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      average smoker smokes about 20 cigarettes a day. so it’s a little less than half of a monthly use of cigarettes.

      from what i understand the ration was meant to supplement what you consume, not provide everything

      • strawberrysocial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Is 20 cigs a day honestly the average nowadays?? Mind blowing and sad. My mum who was an addicted smoker since she was 10 years of age and went through maybe 5 to 10 cigs a day.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          it’s been the average for a long time. it’s due to nicotine’s pharmacological effects. its half life is roughly 1~2 hours. so a smoker on average will feel the compulsion to smoke an hour or so after the last cigarette. since most people are awake somewhere 16 hours a day, that’s about ~16 cigarettes a day.

          your mom’s smoking habits were definitely atypical

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is what Conservatives around the world want and glory hallelujah we are almost there! The only difference is all those rations will not come from the government but from corporations paid for by the government.

    • 4 boxes Kraft Mac and Cheese
    • 6 cans Heinz Beans
    • Etc.
    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      How?

      With an average net income ranging from 1100 USD to 2400 USD, any average worker should eat better than this

      This lady monthly rations amount to approximately 160 USD, while the average minimum wage workers spends from 260 to 350 USD worth on groceries

      Which I really doubt is a problem, given that the median of the monthly income in usa is about 5k usd

  • Zement@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    That is around 970 calories a day if you take 1/30th of each edible item on the Table.

    It’s not enough, but surprisingly almost half the needed amount.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      If Poland is anything like the US, families were expected to keep a garden where they grew many vegetables and fruits, and often kept chickens.

      • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Are you referring to ‘Victory Gardens’ in WWII?

        If so, that’s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, since Poland had been at peace for over 35 years.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m Estonian, not Polish, but I’ve helped my mom grow potatoes and stuff. Because of the peasant history, our people have always grown our own food. Only in the least few decades has it been getting less common.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      You supplement it with potatoes, carrots, cabbage, cucumbers and other veggies. And some apples and seasonal fruit.

      Things sucked but people weren’t malnourished back then.

      Also not shown here: gasoline was also rationed, as were cars themselves.

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    Their priorities were fucked up. Cigarettes and alcohol, obviously, but more sugar than rice? Huh?

    Also, lots of meat but no other food groups?

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 days ago

      Elsewhere in the comments it’s mentioned that these were just the rationed things; there were unrationed foodstuffs.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Rice is not precisely native to Poland… The staple food is potatoes, which weren’t rationed.

  • EvilHaitianEatingYourCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Unpopular opinion: we need to ration electricity consumption as well as fuel today, even in capitalists countries. Because that stuff actually has incredible impact on the planet, and will (must) drive consumption down, so that companies / individuals start integrating “efficiency” into their thinking

    I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

    • bitcrafter@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t see any other solution to the “exponentially growing power consumption” problem.

      In the U.S., at least, power generation has been roughly flat for the last 20 years, not growing exponentially:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_of_the_United_States#/media/File:Timeline_of_U.S._electricity_generation_by_major_energy_source.png

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Pigouvian taxes are a traditional solution to negative externalities, and they are often better received by the public than rationing.

      • It’s expensive to be poor - the lights turning off a few days before the end of the month will incur even more costs than a higher electricity bill.

      • Taxes raise money for other programs, instead of costing money to enforce rationing.

      • Higher taxes in general will also help reduce inflation.

      • Tax revenue can be spent on stimulus checks to offset the cost for people who use less energy than average.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Rather than stimulus checks we need to be using the money to subsidize alternatives. And we can just switch subsidies. Some examples of that include that by reducing cattle subsides we can subsidize lower emissions meat alternatives or even offer free classes on how to cook meals that happen to be lower emissions, and we can stop funding airports and put that money into rail systems, similarly by removing mandatory minimum parking and reducing road funding that money can be put into transit solutions that enable less car centric lifestyles.

  • scutiger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    Half a liter of vodka monthly? Aren’t the Poles known for their consumption of vast quantities of the stuff?

    • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This has little to do with socialism/capitalism and more with that fact that the economy was centrally (terribly) governed and most of the products were exported to the “friend nation USSR”

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        75% of sugar output exported to the Sovs while the citizens of Poland ‘enjoyed’ sugar rationing.

        • niktemadur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          75% of sugar output exported to moscow and leningrad, you think the people of anywhere outside the immediate vicinity of those two cities got to see any of it? Let alone anywhere east of the Urals?

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        Comunimsm is not that bad! It only has a 100% failure rate, but that’s the CIA/UFO/Soros fault!

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Reminder you live in a country where you have to pay other people to deny you healthcare.

          • sneaky@r.nf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Plenty of countries with universal healthcare that are also capatalistic societies. I love communism, too but the other comment had a valid point.

        • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Ussr never fully recovered after ww2 and had to engage in a very expensive arms race while attempting to rebuild. Imo saying that communism doesn’t work often forgets this fact.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Plenty of capitalist countries did recover, so that just one more argument against communism.

            • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              Completely different situations. One country had to recover from complete devastation and bootstrap everything from scratch, could not rely on anyone and had to fund and support allies with that.

              While other European countries were barely touched it could benefit from US funding which was in itself completely untouched and benefited from the collapse of the entire capitalist competition worldwide.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                The ussr was much less devastated than Germany, and it didn’t support allies, it received support first and exploited colonies later.

                • humble peat digger@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Not true. Majority of ussr most economically valuable areas were destroyed.
                  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kPVo9w79D6w

                  Ussr provided major military assistance to china Korea, vietnam, African countries fighting for freedom.
                  Also look up comecon.
                  Also who do you think was responsible for reconstruction of half the germany? It was ussr most which was also half destroyed itself.

                  All of this was a much higher burden on ussr than US which was left intact.

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I mean, they didn’t have to engage in an arms race, any more than either side had to go to space or the moon. They did so for the propaganda, and to make themselves look tough, the same as the US.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      They are in the same place where pro-capitalist liberals are when people talk about food insecurity in today’s West, and let’s face it, the rest of the non-Western world.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Can someone calculate the calories in that? I’m too lazy.

    Maybe don’t include the sugar. That’s a shit ton of sugar to go through in month.

    • asqapro@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ballpark estimate, excluding the sugar:

      2.5kg beef: ~6265 Calories

      0.5l vodka: ~1082 Calories

      1.3kg white rice: ~4743 Calories

      1.3kg flour: ~4732 Calories

      500g butter: ~3585 Calories

      300g cooking oil (Google says rapeseed oil is popular in Poland so I used that): ~2652 Calories

      250g chocolate: ~1338 Calories

      Total: 24,397 Calories or ~813 Calories per day

      Some other people online also did the math and came up with similar numbers. For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37027027 came up with 33,063 Calories (including the sugar)

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nice, that was super fast. I guess it’s probably enough for one person to survive if they practically don’t move at all the entire month, for a little while at least.

        Still not pleasant I imagine.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What would you be willing to do to ensure that your fellow citizens aren’t dying of literal hunger on the streets?

          (Clearly to most Americans, that answer is “absolutely nothing”)

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Exactly, and thst sounds like the sort of rations Americans had during the world wars. It was supplimented by a mass movement of community gardens. Personally I’m more a fan of the ration points system we used so that you aren’t stuck with stuff you won’t use and those who’d rather eat like Hannibal of Carthage and go less hungry can do that while those who’d rather eat more resource intensive foods like meat can accept the cost of their demands in the form of calories. Though that may just be because I’ve always been the sort who’d rather be full of lentils and potatoes than hungry after a burger, even before I quit meat.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Though that may just be because I’ve always been the sort who’d rather be full of lentils and potatoes than hungry after a burger,

              I think some of us have experienced poverty (or near-poverty) in our lives, so we understand things like this.

      • kralk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You get another 333 calories from the sugar, add it to the vodka!