President Donald Trump did not take kindly to being asked whether he believed bombing civilian power plants and bridges would constitute war crimes after he threatened to do just that in Iran.

The president, 80, was taking questions from reporters in the Oval Office when he was asked about his threat this week on Truth Social.

“You’re talking about blowing up civilian power plants and bridges. Much of the civilized world would consider that a war crime. Do you?” the reporter asked Trump point blank.

The president paused for a moment before deciding it was probably best not to answer the question at all, which had clearly annoyed him.

“Uhhh, I won’t respond to that question,” Trump said before demanding to know which outlet the reporter worked for.

“The New York Times,” the reporter responded.

“I figured so; the failing New York Times,” Trump said before turning away.

HE ordered the targeting of civilians (remember the girls school?) and civilian infrastructure. War criminals are held to account. If you don’t wanna be a war criminal held to account, stop doing war crimes.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    lol, good one. When has anyone from the United States government been tried for war crimes? Would that not need to be prosecuted at The Hague?

    Idk why people think anything will be different. It’s good to have something to hold on to, I guess.

    • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Truth. I can’t recall a single US president that wasn’t at least implicated of war crimes. Not one of them was held accountable in the slightest.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tbf despite the shortcomings of other presidents, I don’t think any others were as globally despised as Trump.

        Like, look at Bush/Cheny. Trump makes them look more harmless than Simon/Garfunkel.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      IIRC, they have a mandate to invade the Hague to liberate US officials, so not only will they not offer people up, they will kill not to.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This cat gets it. Until the United States empire falls, there will be no accountability. It will fall, eventually, but no time soon.

        • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          And we’ll get to live through more thrashing as it flails into the pit of its own demise, taking down whatever it can with it.

          Then we get techno feudalism from the ashes, that’ll be fun.

          I’m tired.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a lot of anger. The ICC and the concept of war crimes itself haven’t been around for even a century, we live in a time of unprecedented things

      I’m not saying the right people will be punished, but there will be punishment