grumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago📡📡📡thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square176linkfedilinkarrow-up1756arrow-down156
arrow-up1700arrow-down1image📡📡📡thelemmy.clubgrumpy_cat@thelemmy.club to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square176linkfedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agowe’re saying the same thing: understimulated reward centre. and i never mentioned depression.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThe implication of the way you said it is that there an underlying chemical/biological cause that could be addressed with a chemical/biological solution; I don’t think the arrow of causality points in that direction.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month ago“the implication of the way you said it” is gold, i’m stealing that
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoAnd just two days ago someone responded to my comment with, “No offense, but were you on drugs when you wrote that?”
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIf I start doing drugs, will I make more sense?
we’re saying the same thing: understimulated reward centre. and i never mentioned depression.
The implication of the way you said it is that there an underlying chemical/biological cause that could be addressed with a chemical/biological solution; I don’t think the arrow of causality points in that direction.
“the implication of the way you said it” is gold, i’m stealing that
And just two days ago someone responded to my comment with, “No offense, but were you on drugs when you wrote that?”
i mean that’s also applicable
If I start doing drugs, will I make more sense?
probably depends on the drug.