• Nomorereddit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We don’t care about pennies, even the government doesn’t care about pennies. Now give us some good sasha gray content, she’s playing my favorite video game right now.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are enough in circulation that nobody will miss the lack of printing for decades

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I work at a bank, and people are trying to buy all of our pennies as collectors and leave none for the people who are actually going to use them. it’s a clusterfuck lmao

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The penny died pretty quick in Canada, I would argue and say it’ll be gone within 3 years, tenders will just round up/down the total and no longer hand them out.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It reminds me of a popular misconception about Earth and our atmosphere and climate.

      A lot of the people who advocate for the environment believe that reduction in trees will jeopardize our oxygen and that we’ll run out of breathable air at some point.

      The problem is actually that trees capture and hold carbon, the danger to the environment is almost strictly just the release of excess carbon.

      If we lost every last tree and phytoplankton bloom in the world, we would still have enough breathable oxygen to last potentially thousands or hundreds of thousands of years, with some estimates depending on a lot of complex factors, saying that some level of of population density could stay alive for millions of years.

      (Edited figures)

      Some of you dummies think I’m saying climate change isn’t a concern. You needa learn to read.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That seems off

        Where are you getting this millions of years number? Seems really unrealistic considering millions of humans live at altitude and have barely enough oxygen in the air as it is

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of the only things the Trump admin is doing that I actually agree with and have since I was a child. Fuck coins in general but getting rid of the most dead weight coin of them all is a step in the right direction.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree getting rid of the penny is a good thing, but it’s really bad that this is setting a precedent to give the president a lot more power

      It’s also a really poor implementation considering the government has given no guidance on how businesses must handle it

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      No one can agree on which time to use so time change will never go away. It’s really annoying. I don’t give a shit which we use, just toss of the ducking time change. It’s 1 hour, people gotta chill.

      • simulacra_procession@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sunset at 5pm sucks, it feels unnatural, let it be dark early in the morning idgaf I want the sun to be out when I get off work

        • wia@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree with you but also I don’t care anymore lol. I just want the change gone. No one agrees on which though. Someone needs to just flip a coin and we all get used to it and adjust

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Someone else mentioned children waiting for the bus get run over at a much higher rate if it’s dark early in the morning, which is a pretty valid argument

          That being said, I’d much rather it get dark later in the day

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fuck at this point does it even matter? The time change is bullshit on a baseline so long as it’s done on the state level it shouldnt be too bad since eventually one of them will probably win out.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am a champion of the idea of keeping daylight saving over standard time but I am more and more starting to think that the time change is the best compromise we are going to get with the people who insist on getting to work at 8am in the light.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Let’s look at NY city.

        June 21th longest day, sunrise is at 5:24 am (Set 8:31 pm)

        December 21th longest night, sunrise is at 6:42 am (Set 4:32 pm)

        If you got rid of daylight savings time then the sun would rise at 4:24 am in June and set at 7:31 pm.

        (Most people in NY probably want the extra hour of light at 7:31 pm instead of 4:24 am)

        If you kept permanent daylight savings then the sun would rise at 7:42 am in December and set at 5:32 pm)

        (Most people in NY probably want some light before 8 because it’s going to be dark after dinner anyways)

        So many people are awake before 8 am compared to 5 am

        So many people enjoy the light at 7:30 pm in the summer

        Switching really is the sweet spot for NY

        Location is definitely important too in hating or liking DST

        Ontonagon, Mi sun sets at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

        Dexter, Me sun sets at 4:10 pm tonight (6:33 am rise)

        Same time zone, both northern cities.

        If we didn’t get off DST Ontonagon wouldn’t see the sunrise until almost 9 am today

        People in Dexter might have preferred to stay on DST getting light between 7:33 am to 5:10 pm today

        The farther west you live in a time zone the less you like DST generally. Farther east, the more you like it.

        Ontonagon is so west it should really be in Central Time zone.

        If that was the case then the sun would set at 4:25 pm tonight (6:58 am rise) (basically Dexter ME times)

        At that point they might want to stay on DST and it would make it exactly what it was today, sunset at 5:25 pm tonight (7:58 am rise)

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I live both north and east of NYC, I want the later sunlight in summer and winter. The first hour of light is wasted on me and many others. Farmers maybe not, but around here that’s pretty much over by late October anyway.

          I’ve also lived at the most extreme opposite end of the Eastern time zone in Michigan, and like the late evening sunlight even more!

      • mos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I just think humans don’t work well with such a sudden change even just 1 hr. Maybe there’s a way we could add/remove a minute every day over two months or something lol

          • mos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            As I was typing it I was trying to figure out how it would work on electronic devices and my head exploded. Let alone just your everyday clock.

  • henfredemars@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    2 days ago

    Note that the legal framework for phasing out the coin is entirely absent. This was an illegal act as well because only Congress determines what money exists and will be used according to the Constitution.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      the constitution hasnt mattered for over 20 years now, glad your finally waking up to that fact now though

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      It still exists and can still be used. They’re just not making more of them.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re missing the point because they didn’t use precise language

        Congress establishes what coins and bills are to be minted. The executive branch executes that directive. Congress has directed the executive branch to mint pennies. The executive branch determined 0 is a number of pennies to mint. The Mint is not minting pennies, despite congress directing them to do so

        If the president is allowed to interpret laws congress passes so broadly, it gives an incredible amount of power to the executive branch. Historically, the president hasn’t been given nearly that level of authority

        It’s illegal because congress said to mint pennies, but the executive branch is not minting pennies

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The mint doesn’t continuously produce all coins at all times. They produce them in response to coinage needs.

          Most people are using bills or digital payments, so coinage is down across the board. Inflation means the penny is worth so much less that it’s infrequently used, so there’s no point in minting new ones right now. If there is a need, they’ll start minting again.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Manufacturing capability is not the problem, the problem is executive overreach in every aspect of our nation and lack of consequence for those breaking the law.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      More to the point, it isn’t sensible.

      A penny lasts decades as a tangible item of currency. I have pennies in my change purse right now that were struck in the 1960’s.

      The value isn’t in how much it costs to make it but in how long it lasts as usable token of trade.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        At this point most people just throw pennies away. At best they’re being saved in a change jar to be brought to the bank. Almost no one is using pennies for payment of goods and services. It’s a useless waste of money to produce and congress should have gotten rid of them decades ago

        The only issue here is that it isn’t congress getting rid of it. It’s the president taking power from congress to get rid of it

      • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        How long it lasts as a usable token of trade

        So it’s still worthless. Genuinely, what can a penny purchase? A nickel? A dime? None of these coins can buy something individually, and a large chunk of the population doesn’t carry them because the utility they gain for having exact change is less than the coins are worth

        To be clear, I understand the coins vs. bills argument, but I’m personally in favor of cutting all coins up to the quarter. Or cutting all coins except dimes and half dollars, but dimes are annoying coins

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I prefer redecimalization. Just redesign money with a zero chopped off. Also get rid of the $1 bill and replace it with a coin. This would make the coins represent the current value of 10c, 50c, $1, $2.5, (maybe $5), and $10, with bills for $20, $50, $100, $200, and $1000. Bills would be representing amounts of money that while commonly exchanged, isn’t actively everyday transaction amounts, those would be represented by coinage.

          It’s similar to the current situation with yen, where usually you’re rooting in your pocket to pay for something small, not opening your wallet. Though for the life of me I can’t understand why the 1¥ coin remains

          • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I appreciate trying to save resources here, but Americans are way too fucking stupid for that to work, amid a myriad of other issues I see with this

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They’d get over it. Just give it a new name and they’ll figure it out eventually.

              I’m sure there will be some holdouts, but that’s not exclusive to Americans.

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s not what decimalization means. We’re already on the decimal system, it’s not possible to decimalize again.

            You’re thinking of revaluation

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, but like, is it a valuable token of trade? It’s 1c, yes that’s money, its a whole percent of a dollar, but it’s illegal in most of the country to pay someone less than 12.5 of them per minute of labor, an unlivably low wage. The $15/hr wage is increasingly normal for low skilled labor and is a quarter a minute. A quarter is great as you don’t need to fill your pocket with it to buy something from a vending machine. Ok that’s not the most honest comparison as vending machines haven’t taken pennies in at least a decade. It’s a denomination sufficiently small to cause a lot of people to just not bother with them, they just aren’t worth the time to use them or keep track of them.

      • workerONE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Pennies are produced and put into circulation, but people are not saving them and exchanging them for dollars, and they don’t spend them again. They are constantly being produced and lost. Maybe in the 1960s people felt the need to gather their pennies for reuse but not today.

        • foodandart@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I guess. It all depends on whether or not you can afford to igonore pennies.

          If I can not have to break down a dollar bill by fishing 54 cents - two quarters and 4 pennies out of my change purse, I’ll do it.

          I’ve found that it’s when people break bigger bills down, that smaller notes tend to disappear faster.

          This is what the term “nickel and diming” is about… It’s getting you to give up more money in total by taking smaller amounts more often.

          It is a thing that’s real.

          The flip-side of that is what happens with getting paid daily, weekly, bi-weekly and monthly. It’s the day labor that ends up constantly skint, because they weren’t dealing with large whole number balances. Even getting paid weekly, I was saving less than when I went to every two weeks. Now that I’m self-employed, I choose when to bill, and I do so monthly. Get BIG checks and sink it all straight into savings. Because I am paid every 4 weeks, I have to change how I spend and spend less and save more. LOTS more.

          Pennies count at that point. Critically.

          I’ve yet to earn more than 35k in a year - (and that was years ago) - and the biggest thing is havng a balance and seeing that numnber in the savings account rise. I have found that sticking to large lump sums - psychologicaly, you want to hold onto it more and it does change how you aproach savings and money in general.

          I can take a couple hundred dollar bills and slip them into a book on the shelf and they’ll sit there for months before I dig them out. I can try the same thing with 5 20 dollar bills and they’re usually gone within a week.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes and it needs to be done legally. Granted though it needs to be at least 5x as long as other currency. Its not that I don’t think the penny should be taken out as much as it should be done appropriately.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Abolishing the USD cent comes way too late.

    Was abolishing the half penny in 1857 a good idea? If so, then abolishing the quarter would be a good idea today. It has about as much buying power as the half penny did in 1857.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but honestly getting rid of coins is an admission that inflation is high relative to 40-50 years ago. When pretty much every government wants to keep that fact out of the public consciousness. Especially the current US government who wants to both claim we don’t have inflation at all, and are the ones getting rid of the penny.

      I’ve been saying we should drop the penny for almost 2 decades, but I still kind of look at getting rid of the penny as a sign of our current government’s abysmal handling of inflation.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      So I don’t know the term for it, maybe it’s just propaganda, but a quarter feels like it has value.

      The penny however doesn’t have that feeling. Vending machines often say “No Pennies” and toll booths say “No Pennies”, even though the Penny exists everyone sorta already agreed the Penny wasn’t worth the hassle.

      I think you could probably convince people the same is true for the nickel. Although eliminating just the nickel is tricky since you’d keep the dime and quarter and that divides weirdly. So you should also remove the dime but that now really starts to feel like it had value.

      But the quarter. That would be a hard sell. You’re basically eliminating all coins at that point. Unless you plan on making the half dollar wayyy more popular.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        When we got rid of the half penny it was worth more than what dimes are worth now. Quarters are the only useful coin. We should be rounding all transactions to the nearest quarter.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Logically I completely agree. I just don’t think you could convince the US as a whole that’s the way to go.

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Should just have dimes.

        $1.1 $1.2 $1.3

        There’s no reason to break our currency into thousandths. Hardly a reason to break it into hundredths.

        Could keep quarters to keep hundredths

        Transactions already need a nickel to do 5 cents. So requiring a quarter to do 5 cents isn’t crazy.

        Say you have to pay $1.05

        Dollar and 3 dimes, quarter in change.

        $1.15

        Dollar and a quarter, dime in change.

        But I think just dimes are needed

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Just dimes would probably work logically, but it would feel too weird. If you’re going just dimes, you probably just want to go all in and say no coins.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            50 cent piece would be the way to go. Should then also really push $1 coins, and add in a $2 and $5 coin, although I don’t know if Americans would realistically use them. Coins are much more durable than paper currency though, which would save a lot of money long term

            • MimicJar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean the dollar coin never caught on. I know we still printed the dollar bill, so maybe you could force it by halting the dollar bill. But overall I don’t think new coins are the answer.

              Based on one source, Cash is only ~20% of transactions. Maybe it will always be 20% or maybe it will be smaller and smaller as time goes on.

              I think you’re better off eliminating current coins.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I feel like we should be normalizing $1, $2, and $5 coins at this point. I know $1 coins exist, but nobody uses them. If I drop a $1 coin in a tip jar, people say sarcastically “thanks, that 25 cents will go a long way” because they think it’s a quarter.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Canada was a decade ahead of the US when it came to implementing tap. It’ll take the US a long while to get to the same level of universal acceptance, starting from so far behind

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s about damned time. We honestly should have nothing smaller than quarters right now, going by the same logic as discontinuing the half-penny forever ago (which had more equivalent purchasing power than the dime does now).

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good, while we’re at it we should redecimalize. A coin that can’t pay for a significant portion of something is worthless. People used to buy snacks with coins, and like, thats where they thrive. Coins are more expensive than bills but they can change hands a lot more times. A dime for a soda or a cheap snack, maybe a nickel if it’s a good deal on a bag of chips is about right.

    Like, this isn’t even a monetary policy failure, it’s just something that should happen every century or two in an inflationary economy with a 5% target.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      The rule should be “if you pay with it at a restaurant it should be a coin” because it represents a daily use rather than weekly or monthly and much higher levels of wear and tear.

      If not for credit cards we’d probably need $10 coins.