Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldimagemessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1663arrow-down18
arrow-up1655arrow-down1imageI can see the confusion tbhlemmy.worldPope-King Joe@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square40linkfedilink
minus-squarePope-King Joe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 year agoSomeone with more discipline than I have, that’s for sure.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoIf I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
minus-squareddplf@szmer.infolinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoI’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
minus-squarePope-King Joe@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
Someone with more discipline than I have, that’s for sure.
If I were the techer I would make any test have 68 possible points, just to annoy immature people…
I’s say go for 70 and see these brats strive for 98.5%
I’m fond of the idea of splitting one of the questions into two parts like “38.A” and “38.B”, and listing them as separate questions so that there are 69, but the numbering stops at 68, and then count the split question as one.
I’d go for seventy so that it’s a multiple of ten.
But that’s less obvious I think