• FEIN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 年前

        “no way to stop this” says the only country where this happens

        • Zephorah@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          I didn’t realize the schools were using Run, Hide, Fight. That is the same policy for hospital staff in the event of an active shooter. Maddening.

          • Miles O'Brien@startrek.websitedeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            1 年前

            Having worked in quite a few fields in the last 15 years or so, it’s the same active shooter training they give everyone. Even in stores that sell guns.

            I’ll let the reader decide how fucked up it is that there’s basically a countrywide accepted “standard response”

          • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            I’m sorry, in hospitals? Where a significant portion of the patients can do none of those things?

            • Zephorah@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              1 年前

              They’re not residents, you’re thinking of nursing homes. Roughly a third of hospital patients can walk without assistance, but yes. The rationale is staff doesn’t turn themselves into bullet sponges, because then who is left to remove the bullets once the shooter is dead? Either way, what do unarmed, untrained (to fight) people with the body armor equivalent of pajamas do to stop bullets?

              The patient room doors don’t lock. Sometimes those doors are made of glass. But herding the patients who can walk into the halls is likely an opportunity for an active shooter to hit more targets. As such, everyone hunkers down, and the police take care of it. In theory, per the training modules. Police sometimes run drills with the hospital, depending on locale and interagency dealings.

              Shutting all the fire doors is likely the only defense. Those nurses can be crafty on the fly, but there are limitations.

              I can’t imagine a secondary piece of this policy isn’t hospitals avoiding liability regarding workplace injury/death lawsuits.

              I just hadn’t known until now that in grasping for solutions schools found the standardized hospital policy and are running with it.

                • Zephorah@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 年前

                  In theory. Realistically it’s also about what you’re shot with and where. A robust man shot in the gut with a standard .22 that doesn’t ricochet or hit anything immediately vital probably isn’t even going to ICU after the bullet is fished out. 9mm changes the odds on everything. Again though, 1 bullet to the gut may not be an ICU scenario after surgery, depending. An AK/AR though, why are they even legal for civilians?

                  A child, with any bullet, I don’t like to think about it.

                  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 年前

                    To the gut? It doesn’t matter what the round is. You’re going to the ICU. A .22 isn’t as non-lethal as the memes like to make it out to be, and your gut is a bunch of very critical soft tissue.

                    If it’s to the arm or something, fine. Anywhere in the torso, you’re going to the ICU most likely.

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 年前

            Why maddening? The active shooter response shouldn’t be all that different.

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 年前

      the policy is to stop school shootings

      You should try Europe once. It’s more fun than your 3rd world country.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 年前

      The issue here is that the authorities are letting a piece of half-ass code (Read: AI) decide what is a legitimate threat and, worse still, acting on that determination without question.

      Yeah, at the very least, the software should be passing on the statement, and context surrounding it, along with its ‘judgment’, to the authorities, putting all the responsibility for making the call that X genuinely merits action on said authorities.

      Of course, that’s just one piece of the puzzle, and not a solution if law enforcement isn’t held accountable when they fuck up.