The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoHave we overcomplicated everything?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square237fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1imageHave we overcomplicated everything?lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square237fedilink
minus-squareJackGreenEarth@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoI have 800 downloaded songs
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·3 days agoWhen was the last time you listened to No. 658?
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·3 days agoMine play at random. Actual random, not depending -on-corporate-feels-random.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoPicked by random index or ordered in a random sequence? The former has some small chance of playing the same song twice in a row while the latter plays every song before repeating, so the latter is superior.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoActual random afaik, but it keeps track so I can go back to the correct song. With several hundred a “soon repetition” is not really an issue.
minus-squareJay@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoMy music folder is 8006 files (53.7GB) but I probably only listen to maybe 200 of them that are actually in my normal playlist.
I have 800 downloaded songs
When was the last time you listened to No. 658?
Mine play at random. Actual random, not depending -on-corporate-feels-random.
Picked by random index or ordered in a random sequence? The former has some small chance of playing the same song twice in a row while the latter plays every song before repeating, so the latter is superior.
Actual random afaik, but it keeps track so I can go back to the correct song. With several hundred a “soon repetition” is not really an issue.
My music folder is 8006 files (53.7GB) but I probably only listen to maybe 200 of them that are actually in my normal playlist.