• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    What we need to do is find some way to make a giant fusion reactor and put it in the sky and get energy from it that way.

    But that’s just a pipe dream…

    • FatCrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      What we need is robust decentralized multimodal energy production fit for the local area where it is installed and contributing to a well maintained distributed grid with multiple redundancies and sufficient storage so that incidental costs are minimized and uptime is effectively 100%. Energy is a tool and its generation is a category of tools, whining about people developing a better screwdriver rather than only using hammers is counterproductive when we’re trying to build a house for as many people as possible that doesn’t fucking kill everyone.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I’m whining about China spending very little on current green energy technology while building more and more coal plants and taking advantage of these sort of PR stories.

        I can’t help it, I’m one of those people who whines about climate change.

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 days ago

          ‘spending very little’???

          They produced more new green energy than the total capacity of green energy for the rest of the world combined in 2024.

            • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              In a generation they went from a famine every decade to the end of famines, in a second generation they went from a industrial age economy with most of its people living in extreme poverty to eliminating extreme poverty and some of its people living on par with those in the wealthiest nations. In this generation they have raised the standard of living of their poorest from a poverty the US hasn’t seen in a century to that of middle class Americans in the 1980s. In order to accomplish this, massive amounts of electricity is needed. That lifestyle is naturally wasteful as it takes electricity for granted, but it’s better by most accounts. This is on top of being the world’s factory and the electricity use that entails.

              In short, yes, they need both, and nuclear which they’re also the leader in. Unlike the West they do have plans to get off coal as a power source, and the amount of work they’ve done eliminating coal usage near cities by itself is commendable, compared to its contemporaries like the US.

              • socsa@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                The poorest parts of China are still much poorer than any middle class. Most rural Chinese still do not complete high school.

                • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  And yet they own large farms that are tax free that they can earn money off of. The few low industrialized parts (currently representing less than 200 million) don’t have schools or massive infrastructure, but also have guarantees their way of life and making money is secure until they do have access to those things. And Xinjiang alone shows it’s not an empty promise; going from one of those regions you’re referring to, to a region that rivals Vietnam or Malaysia by itself.

                • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Yeah, mao fucked up, like the US fucked up during its great famine, sorry dust bowl. And then no famine ever again.

                  To your second point, of course you can’t leave if you’re a criminal (every nation on earth has this policy) or in severe debt to the government (most nations have this policy), but you can leave under pretty much any other circumstances. I didn’t click your link but even you wouldn’t be spreading the conspiracy theory of secret global police that kidnap random yellow people for the cpc, right?

                  To your third point, coal plants and any other steam generators are easy to convert over to each other once built. A nuclear plant and a coal plant share 70% of their equipment. Building one lays the foundation for the other. If you need quick base load expansion, you can’t really beat coal or diesel, and continually expanding the quality of life for 1.4 billion people requires constant base load expansion… Even better if it can later be converted into near infinite power sources like nuclear.

                  • ToyDork@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I didn’t click your link but even you wouldn’t be spreading the conspiracy theory of secret global police that kidnap random yellow people for the cpc, right?

                    Wait, that’s a hoax? Fucking TV news, even reposted on youtube where you have trouble telling who’s who, they manage to convince people of shit.

                    I’ll be clear though, the CCP is not to be unconditionally trusted. If you wouldn’t want a random person you never met to be suddenly world dictator, why trust an oligarchy that has proven they refuse to admit fallibility when they do fuck up? Tianamen square is - regardless of what you believe - no different than the people calling it with conspiracy theories about the US (or the whole “Global West”) and “a secret cabal of social elites” (and even if there is no cabal, look where we are now?).

                    The reason to not forget history is not because you can prevent it from repeating. It’s there so we can punish leaders who set themselves up to benefit from it repeating, because we all know where this is leading. Someone is going to commit the last straw, and the bloodbath against leadership in every country in retaliation for exploiting the masses cannot be stopped.

                    After that, I can’t forsee society recovering. We don’t want to recover. Too many people just want to murder anyone who, regardless of whether the victim deserved it, doesn’t fit into their worldview. Saying they deserved it doesn’t make it so. They only deserve it if they want to punish collectives for things, and most of the people who want to kill someone hate collectives, not individuals.

                    I hate Trump, Vance and Musk, but I don’t instantly jump to the conclusion that everyone’s already allied with them in the government. The purge is happening, but it’s not yet complete and it’s not too late to fight back.

            • dnick@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              Probably because they have a billion months to feed and a ridiculously inefficient incentive mechanism for progress in general. Kind of amazing that they put emphasis on green tech at all, except for the fact that they have the bodies to through at it and it’s something the rest of the world values as well.

            • Carl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Last year, China commissioned 96 GW of new coal production and commissioned 356 GW of wind and solar. This was the most coal production China has built in a single year since 2015, and it was still less than the amount of renewables that they put on it.

              I wish China could wave a magic wand and have their entire energy grid go green, but the truth is that their middle class is still growing, and with it the demand for electricity, and even with the massive amount of spending they’ve put into wind and solar those forms of power simply can’t keep up with the rising demand on their own, so coal remains a necessary part of their multimodal grid with multiple redundancies and sufficient storage.

                • ToyDork@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The climate has to get worse for the goal of adding more people from the lower class to the middle class. As someone IN the middle class, who has actual empathy for other human beings, as long as we aren’t going out of our way to kill animals slowly and painfully and/or to the point of extinction, and the ecosystem hasn’t collapsed, I refuse to believe in any goal that puts some vague emphasis on “the climate” as the “good guy” in this.

                  Evolution is an endless process of monsters eating the babies that need the most help to survive. Nature is the reason we’re killing the environment, “survival of the fittest” i.e. only those with advantages survive and adapt to the changing status of the climate, is the very essence of the very capitalism that is killing the climate.

                  Survival of the fittest is obsolete and cruel. It’s time we stopped fighting for “the climate” and started defying capitalism, the one place where we can remove Darwinian competition from it without just destroying it further. Sadly, nature needs competition and death to be what it is. That is why we CHOOSE to see humans as separate, instead of justifying it by calling ourselves “just animals”. In the absence of an actual judge above man, we should strive to meet the expectations we would want a benevolent judge to force us to meet.

                  But let me guess, you’re some greenwashed zealot who only eats vegan food and will probably think I think avocado on toast is common for “young people”? Because only privileged assholes want middle class standards to be lowered. If the superyachts or personal “business” jets were barred from being used by wealthy people like bicycles to globetrot where “the riffraff” can’t afford to go, the dent in carbon emissions would outweigh ALL carbon emissions by everyone else. The rich need to stop riding alone, they can travel 1st class if they want but none of this having a personal jet plane with more seats than the owner has immediate family members. When a teenage “princess” owns a jet so she can fly back and forth to Europe partying non-stop in-flight and until they get back home from vacation-partying every weekend, owning a jet with more than 4 seats is no longer a reasonable thing for the law to allow for private citizens.

                  I can’t survive without the few luxuries in my life because I literally feel so miserable without access to video games that I would commit suicide. That’s not the same as thinking you’re too good to fly commercial, because I believe no one can reasonably be denied access to the luxuries I have and I understand that people are denied much of what I have. If society can’t uplift most people to middle class, fuck the climate. We’re better off dying if it is doomed to collapse before we achieve a world where people are able to truly enjoy living, not just survive.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You know, I was going to reply to this substantively despite your bizarre “fuck the climate” attitude as if there will be a middle class if the Earth keeps warming… but then you decided to make personal attacks, and I stopped reading.

                • Carl@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  If that’s what you think I was saying then you need to work on your reading comprehension.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Sure looks to me like that’s what you were saying:

                    I wish China could wave a magic wand and have their entire energy grid go green, but the truth is that their middle class is still growing, and with it the demand for electricity, and even with the massive amount of spending they’ve put into wind and solar those forms of power simply can’t keep up with the rising demand on their own, so coal remains a necessary part of their multimodal grid with multiple redundancies and sufficient storage.

                    Calling coal necessary…

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The USA and Lockheed Martin have been making PR stories about fusion for over a decade, while increasing emissions.

          I really hope at least one of these is not bullshit.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s too bad there isn’t some sort of way we could store electricity in some sort of containment.

        Then we could do stuff like take electrically-powered devices with us wherever we went! Think of how handy that would be!

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yeah! We could use such technology to trap this “artificial sun” instead, and then have a steady stable output throughout the night for things that use a bunch of electricity but run constantly, like water filtration plants and material processing facilities.

          Great idea! But I guess more research is needed to make this work for the things that use the MOST electricity, instead of small portable devices that use a fraction of the electricity

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Batteries will never be enough for full down time store. Anyone who’s saying otherwise is selling you batteries.

          Just try to do some paper napkin math how much lithium batteries can store and how much we’d need to just satisfy current demand, not even talking about the near future.

          The only battery technology that has promise is good ol’ hydro but it’s only accessible to a few places around the world and in no way sustainable.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Good thing there are options other than batteries. Which I have already linked to.

            Also, I am amused that you are suggesting batteries will never have enough storage in a glowing article about non-practical fusion power.