• Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I never said you made an explicit suggestion, but if you think you’ve made an implied one, go ahead and point out what they might be 🙃

      • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t see what that has to do with fusion energy development. Are they trying to fuse coal into bigger lumps of coal?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          It has to do with energy development in general. Or rather what they are not doing in terms of it. China is working on developing fusion technology while not doing much with developed green technology, instead increasing their reliance on fossil fuels.

          But it’s great PR for them because this article makes it sound like they’re on their way to the green energy they aren’t doing enough about now.

          • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            But but but I thought you said they can’t afford to spend the money on anything because they’re spending it on the Fusion research!

            Are you saying gasp they can fund more than one thing??? Oh my. I bet they definitely can’t afford to invest in solar as well then or coal since they’re spending sooooo much on researching fusion. You’re just imagining things.

              • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                4 days ago

                Oh, so that means you don’t have any issues with people exploring fusion energy. Cool

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  No, I have issues with China using this as PR while they are making climate change worse by building more coal plants. Hence me saying that. Do you think I was saying that for some sort of nefarious reason? Like I am some sort of undercover operative for fossil fuel companies attempting to throw discord?

                  • nomy@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    I am some sort of undercover operative

                    You seem to be heavily invested in telling everyone how bad China’s use of coal is all over this post.

                    A .world mod being on the take wouldn’t surprise anyone.