• Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This type of meme isn’t helpful when people already think the Dem Party isn’t for working class people and elites only lol. Trump listened to people issues about material needs even if he lied. It still worked. Harris and Dems went on the whole time not addressing issues with the economy. Adopting a real working class agenda and free college would do wonders and putting resources to getting the crazy folk away from Education.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ever been to MA?

      Crapton of working class people there. I mean a lot. It is possible to have top-tier education and health care yet have working class people in the same State.

      Being a rural state does not by default equate to “working class”. If anything it probably means more people per capita on government assistance or in poverty.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Working classes don’t need healthcare or education? Quality of life is irrelevant? A strong economy doesn’t matter? One of the highest minimum wages doesn’t affect working class? I

      Free college (depending on income)doesn’t matter?

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s probably more like no one has helped us improve our healthcare / education / quality of life, so we’ll take a gamble on someone different.

      • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Misses the actual pain points. These are good things objectively but these are not the things that people want change

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Maybe we’re learning that democracy fails when the people vote for the things they want over things that they objectively need.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          And yet people in Massachusetts generally elected not to change. Maybe not as big a majority as expected, but by a solid amount. Maybe all it takes is paying attention to healthcare, education, quality of life, free college, etc. maybe we have at least one model and all we have to do is follow it, instead of negativity and blaming mysterious pain points that you never actually identify

      • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        i think you’re missing their point. the working class does want these things, but the meme reinforces the idea that the dems only take care of the rich.

        • immutable@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          How? Does Massachusetts not have working class people in it? Is it a state comprised entirely of the wealthy?

          • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            im not saying i agree with this interpretation. just that the meme reinforces an erroneous causal relation depending on the bias of the reader. im dont know these places very well, but im used to seeing govenrments treating lower class neighborhoods with less attention. its a common perception.

        • Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          “the people” seem to want to change ‘THEYRE SEATING THE CATS, THEYRE EATING THE DAWWGS’…so, fk if “the people” know what they want.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          No it doesn’t. Massachusetts is full of working class people.

          I think you might be confusing cause and effect here. Perhaps the people in MA are “rich” (I would say, doing well. There are tons of working class people in MA, they’re just not necessarily living in squalor) because the dems took care of them. Almost as if we have tons of data backing this up… That Democrats consistently do these types of things, while Republicans constantly walk them back.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Are Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh not “working class” cities? I think there are a whole lot of people who would like a word with you for writing them off.

      Almost as if working class people don’t have to be stupid.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        a decent amount of americans seem to think they are the global best in every category so probably not obvious enough even.

        • Mercuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I hate having to explain this to people when I talk about the insane cost of healthcare in the US.

          “but US healthcare is the best so of course it’s going to be the most expensive”

          No, you moron. It’s the exact same procedure by equally qualified doctors using the same equipment.

          • Grass@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            meanwhile here it’s generally not expensive, but we can’t seem to come up with a reasonable way for foreign doctors to gain canadian credentials and continue to have waits anywhere from hours to coming the next day instead

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe they voted against the incumbent so overwhelmingly because things are hard.

    People vote based on their feelings.

    When they were feeling pain, the message from the Dems was about how great the economy was, but the reality is that the stock market and GDP don’t speak to the quality of life of these people. To them the Dems saying how great things were was dismissive of their real concerns.

    Meanwhile, Trump latched onto their fears and concerns. Yeah, his policies are idiotic, and millions will suffer and be in worse shape. But when they said they couldn’t pay the mortgage or buy groceries, he listened. The Democrats didn’t because they’ve abandoned the working class that should be their backbone.

    • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Maybe they voted against the incumbent

      I wouldn’t be so confident about assigning such motivation.

        • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          So then the trend is getting reder with time then? I don’t see your point.

          It’s not saying 100% of people always vote red. But the majority have for a VERY long time.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              But the point, for this population and this meme, is that they have consistently voting in the same people and the results they have received are similarly consistent, and they keep voting that way.

              Yes broadly there’s been a “vote out the incumbent”, but this illustrates why that’s misguided, as it illustrates the different results of two states with consistent policies for each party.

              • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Not even just consistently, the person accidentally made the point for them that they’ve actually gotten more red over that time. So they’ve somehow kept convincing more people to vote for them despite them never doing a thing to help them.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                When an entire country shifts away from a party, it means the party is doing something to drive them away. Trump is the worst candidate in the history of the country, yet he’s won 2 elections. Why is that?

                It’s because the Dems have abandoned the economic policies that formed the heart of their party and lost the working class vote they’ve relied upon since the Depression.

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        In that one case, they’re a pretty consistent electorate. The general sentiment across America and around the globe since the post-pandemic inflation crisis began has been anti incumbent, which is why we see a lot of changed governments and populist uprisings now.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Damn, did know that. Carry on Massachusetts and the Oklahomans fail to learn and continue to eat shit.

  • kopasz7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the “Intellectual Yet Idiot” uses the term “uneducated”.

    • Nassim Taleb, Skin in the game
      • kopasz7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The hidden costs of health care are largely in the denial of antifragility. But it may not be just medicine—what we call diseases of civilization result from the attempt by humans to make life comfortable for ourselves against our own interest, since the comfortable is what fragilizes.


        Less Is More

        For instance, a small number of homeless people cost the states a disproportionate share of the bills, which makes it obvious where to look for the savings. A small number of employees in a corporation cause the most problems, corrupt the general attitude—and vice versa—so getting rid of these is a great solution. A small number of customers generate a large share of the revenues. I get 95 percent of my smear postings from the same three obsessive persons, all representing the same prototypes of failure (one of whom has written, I estimate, close to one hundred thousand words in posts—he needs to write more and more and find more and more stuff to critique in my work and personality to get the same effect). When it comes to health care, Ezekiel Emanuel showed that half the population accounts for less than 3 percent of the costs, with the sickest 10 percent consuming 64 percent of the total pie.

        • Nassim Taleb, Antifragile
  • bradd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    There couldn’t be any other factors at play here, it’s clear as day. Red is bad and blue is good.

    Stellar work, truely impressed. I can tell whoever whipped this up is highly educated and well respected. What a gift.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      In case you’re wondering why you’re getting down voted, it’s because you didn’t even offer up a valid argument and instead engaged in ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy.

      I get that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but if the richest states are almost all blue and the poorest ones almost all red, that is a very strong correlation and trying to claim it is insignificant only makes you seem the fool.

      You seem to be intelligent. Ask yourself why this post made you so upset.

      • Disgracefulone@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You really didn’t have to throw in the “seem to be intelligent” part but that very conscientious of you.

        I’ll go ahead and fix it for you though and be the asshole.


        In case you’re wondering why you’re getting down voted, it’s because you didn’t even offer up a valid argument and instead engaged in ad hominem, which is a logical fallacy.

        I get that correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but if the richest states are almost all blue and the poorest ones almost all red, that is a very strong correlation and trying to claim it is insignificant only makes you seem the fool.

        You seem to be intelligent. Ask yourself why this post made you so upset.

      • bradd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I appreciate your input, but I’m not confused. The post and the comments are something I’d expect to see on reddit, mostly pathetic. Not a whole lot of critical thinking, oversimplification of complex topics, drawing conclusions to dunk on the “poorly educated”, nevermind the vast differences between the states that could better account for the results being associated in the meme.

        Im don’t mind the 👎 I’m not here for a W by this crowd.

      • bradd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The term “poorly educated” not supposed to be interpreted as bad? The sad dog by Oklahoma not supposed to be interpreted as bad? The point of the stats are to show relative good bad based on some metrics, not to be interpreted as good or bad?

        If I’m misunderstanding the post maybe others are as well, why don’t you do us all a favor and explain it so that we can better understand.

  • dodecahedron@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I hate Republicans too, they’re selling the whole country for parts, but this meme sucks.

    First of all, “all counties were red/blue” is not what “unanimous” means.

    Second of all, I don’t think “ha ha your state is poor” is the grand slam argument you think it is.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        And the only reason their state and local governments are able to remain solvent…

        These states would collapse completely without the largesse of the federal government (funded by blue states) if they ever seceded.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      First of all, “all counties were red/blue” is not what “unanimous” means.

      I agree with you there.

      Second of all, I don’t think “ha ha your state is poor” is the grand slam argument you think it is.

      Takes a lot of mental gymnastics to boil down all the listed differences as “state is poor”. Unless you mean “poor” as in “in bad shape” and not “economically suffering”. I’ll assume you mean the former as that’s the only way your argument makes sense.

      I think it’s more about how a state is voting against its own interests. There is NOTHING about the Republican platform that would improve any of the listed metrics. If anything, Republican politics would only further worsen an already bad state of affairs.

      And of the off chance your initial argument was entirely economic, it’s Democrats who want federal government involvement to help poor states.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        There is NOTHING about the Republican platform that would improve any of the listed metrics.

        They can make those metrics in other states worse.

        • Mercuri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          LOL. You’re right, if they make Massachusetts worse than Oklahoma then Oklahoma’s ranking would improve! I never thought about that. BRILLIANT!

  • ilikenoodlez@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Massachusetts is fucked. Only a good place to live if your very well off or a career welfare recipient.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    230
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    if living in russia taught me anything, people in distress reduce themselves (and got reduced) to the most basic questions, like who is to blame, and populists have them like a piece of cake.

    Most vatniks, not unlike MAGAs, don’t have answers to many questions, they want to be left alone to manage the hole they happened to be born into, and the promise of a candidate or ideology that does just that or even paints their quest as a herioic one, or a sacred sacrifice, would win again and again until there is someone to work with that and educate them.

    They are used to live in shit and depend on themselves, don’t know anything better and become pretty jealous if others get that. Others having it worse, especially their ‘enemies’, kinda makes their own living more bearable. Their struggle is a downpainment for a mission of punishing the unworthy ones.

    When a person is downscaled to that childish level of consciousness it’s impossible to reach them with rhetorics that don’t directly benefit them.

    As long as they continue to be like that and their thoughts are unchallenged, they’d always vote maga.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      I haven’t seen an analysis from your perspective before. Lines up very well with my experience from the Southern US.

      • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you look at the impacts to their lives from the Clinton presidency, it is understandable that they would think that Democracts are not necessarily working in their interests.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Clinton really did fuck us over, though I guess the Bosnians like him.

          Well lets hope we can correct course and make changes, unless Trump triggers a civil war or removes too much load bearing duck tape from the federal government and it more or less implodes