• frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    You know what, now that your mention it, wasn’t the explanation that the signal was reflected back to the surface due to the ionising radiation of something, so the beam was kinda split or doubled. So my premise was wrong.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah. They tried to split the beam to account for the radiation, half of it made it through, the other half mirrored back. I’m guessing the computer can extrapolate the remaining matter based off of data saved in the pattern buffer?

      Either way, Thomas Riker was way under-utilized in Star Trek. I also love how “okay, sure” everyone is about this situation.

      • AEsheron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I assume they sent a lot more data than it takes to make a single person. Eventually enough data for a whole Ryker was received at each location, while a lot more data got scattered.