• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    When I post paragraphs of theory, I put it behind a spoiler out of courtesy to people who might feel that it’s spamming up the thread. That doesn’t mean drag should ignore it when drag is uninformed about the subject matter and I’m providing drag information about it.

    The fact that Russia was a monarchy does not preclude the existence of representative bodies. The Duma was first established in 1905, in response to a revolution that year. This is really basic stuff.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Drag just doesn’t think Russian history is very important. Drag spends more time learning about new world indigenous politics, culture, and metaphysics. If you want to learn about communism, don’t go to Russia. Go to Australia. Australians did it for 60,000 years, and Russians couldn’t even manage to do it for 1. Drag is reading Kayanerenko;wa: The Great Law Of Peace, about the politics of the Haudenosaunee people.

      https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/twinrabbit-stolen-anarchy Here is a transcript of a youtube video about how Marx, Engels, and the rest of those white men culturally appropriated communism from Turtle Islanders. Drag values the work they have done trying to bring about communism, but drag prefers firsthand wisdom over secondhand. Drag thinks reading Lenin is a waste of time when you could be reading the philosophy of people who have lived in actual communist societies.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Drag is free to say that reading Lenin is a waste of time, but don’t then try to tell me I’m wrong about Lenin when drag doesn’t know very basic things about Lenin’s positions or conditions.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Drag thinks the precise opposite. That the parties Lenin discussed weren’t electoral parties. The meaning of the word party back then isn’t the same as now. Nowadays parties compete in electoralism. Organisations like Extinction Rebellion or the Proud Boys, which operate outside the electoral system, are not what we would call parties today. And yet Lenin’s “parties” are more similar to XR than to the Greens. Drag thinks you’ve been misled by a bad translation from the English of a century ago to the English of today.

            Drag 100% agrees with the strategy of creating socialist organisations outside of the government. Creating socialist organisations inside the government is more complicated. It’s good in most places, but not in America. And it isn’t what Lenin told you to do.