• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Which raises the question: Why should Subaru continue to exist if their entire lineup in 10 years time is only shared platforms? The only thing they’ll be selling on is name recognition- their interiors or features are no better and in many cases worse than Toyota. And they sure don’t show up any cheaper either.

        They’re basically a dead car company with nothing to their name. My how the giants have fallen.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Brand preference. GMC and Chevy have always released the same vehicles yet still both exist and I know more than a few people who prefer one over the other.

          That aside, Subaru still checks boxes that Toyota doesn’t like the AWD Outback wagon and the AWD WRX. Here in the PNW, both brands are extremely popular.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        More like Toyota owns Subaru at this point. Subaru can’t build anything innovative of their own and haven’t for a decade. RIP.

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can tell there is a design difference. The Uncharted/C-HR is a Toyota design - front wheel drive first platform (rear motor is only half as powerful as the front) with limited interior space, especially in the back. The Trailseeker/Woodland is a Subaru design - symmetrical 4WD system, ample backseat space, based on the Global Platform, the chassis layout every Subaru’s used in all their cars for years. They know their base, and they’re very much a “don’t change what works” kind of company.