I think Lemmy has a problem with history in general, since most people on here have degrees/training in STEM. I see a lot of inaccurate “pop history” shared on here, and a lack of understanding of historiography/how historians analyze primary sources.
The rejection of Jesus’s historicity seems to be accepting C S Lewis’s argument - that if he existed, he was a “lunatic, liar, or lord,” instead of realizing that there was nothing unusual about a messianic Jewish troublemaker in Judea during the early Roman Empire.


Yeah - it is an unpopular opinion on Lemmy though. I’ve been accused of being Christian for making this argument, as if accepting the historicity of the figure inherently means accepting the claim that he was a divine being.
I think you’re looking for the word “history”
edit: sorry… I try not to be that guy, but I couldn’t help myself
I was not.
Historicity: the quality of being a real and important part of history and not a myth or legend (= ancient story)
I stand corrected, TIL!
That’s because nobody goes around claiming jebus was real except christians. Way to troll, asshole.
Adults are discussing history. Whatever they did to you in Sunday school class is not relevant here.