• Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes.

      If you can’t drink milk, don’t drink milk. Drink the coffee without the milk. Or drink water or wine or tea or whatever else they serve.
      When did a lack of little luxury accommodations like these milk substitutes become intolerance?

      Does stocking milk ethically require that you stock alternatives for those who want something like milk, but can’t have it?

          • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zipBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure what America has to do with what I said. Don’t try generalizing people, it’s just discriminating for no reason and it doesn’t work.

            I was refering to @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 's comment being aggressive and upset with the “Putain, non”. It’s just conservative because clearly they know what consumers really want, and it’s not change, right, right?

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. If someone wants or needs to avoid certain products, that’s great. There’s plenty of options. But it’s not a restaurant’s job to cater to every whim. They can’t always have everything.

        I can’t have fish. My brother is allergic to peanuts. So I eat dishes without fish, he eats them without peanuts. I’m not going to ask for the ‘fishless salmon’.

    • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zipBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So? I’m sorry but I don’t get how that’s related to the discussion.

      Sure, they can. It’s just that there’s no need to feel offended at someone asking for a milk alternative.