1. never signed up for anything like this,
  2. never donated to or signed up for emails from the DNC, et al.,
  3. political texts like this come all the time, and
  4. I hesitate to reply “stop” because I don’t want them to know this is a live number (is my instinct here outdated/inapplicable?)
  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Hey there we’re the krazy kaucasians for Kamala…

    Wait a second, let’s just go with White dudes for Harris

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You ever see the show Modern Family? I want a new show starring the husband from that show, about a wholesome totally not racist white guy who goes about life COMPLETELY oblivious to how his actions are percieved by other people.

      Almost like a not racist version of Mr Magoo.

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        that could be any of the 4 husbands on that show, to varying degrees. you’ll have to be more specific.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Honestly, having watched it at some point, I’m fairly sure they mean the one that isn’t an old dude with a young latina trophy wife and is straight.

          All those husbands are oblivious to a lot of shit, but that one is the absolute most oblivious lol

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    For sure don’t in any way respond, just report spam and block the number. Lots of these things are phishing attempts, trying to get you to give personal information (or even money), and aren’t connected to the things they mention.

    • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Lots Most Pretty well all of these things are phishing attempts.

      Follow parent’s advice.

      Never, ever, ever respond, even reverse-uno.
      Otherwise, you’ve helped them.

    • lars@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s no “Report Junk” on iOS Messages unless it’s an email address texting you.

      • ccunning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Every message I have received on my iPhone from someone not in my contacts has this after that latest message:

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not true—I just successfully reported this text as junk. It tries to auto-detect spam, and coming from an email address is one of the signs of that, but not the only one.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    is my instinct here outdated/inapplicable?

    Yes.

    It’s so cheap to send SMS messages, and you don’t pay for undeliverable messages, so they can just send to random numbers.

    They also receive deliverability responses for each number. So they know whether a phone received the message whether or not you reply.

    Finally, if you reply STOP you’re unlikely to fit their demographic very well anyway. As in… they’re not trying to reach the type of people who will actively try to avoid receiving these messages.

    That said, there’s probably no point replying STOP because most firms just wont honor it in the long term. As in they might not message you for the remainder of that particular messaging project (campaign), but they’ll just start a new campaign tomorrow with a new sender and no “STOP” requests.

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    In regards to not having signed up, depending on what state you’re in, the parties can query your voter records, some states make your phone number available in those queries. There are other avenues too, like Colorado’s DMV sells your personal information to third parties without your consent, for example.

    • Korne127@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      What the fuck… how can people in the US live with something like that? And how does this not massively hurt her chances?!

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        how can people in the US live with something like that?

        We’ve had a number of deeply corrupt individuals in charge of our federal department meant to police this sort of thing.

        And how does this not massively hurt her chances?!

        Even odds are that it’s meant to.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have a Pixel. I did not realize how bad this gets until work made me take an iPhone as my work phone. Holy hell. No amount of “Delete and report as junk” helps.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your country is crazy.

      I get maybe 3-4 spam messages a year and those are all scams, not ads, much less political ads (which I don’t think would even be legal)

      • Halosheep@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have never once received one of these messages. Doesn’t happen to everyone.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    A friend told me that if you use undesirable language (please don’t stoop to racial slurs), they’ll mark your number as ‘hostile’. This will propagate to other lists, removing you from them before you’re even added. She swears (pun intended) by it.

    Edit: it’s important you don’t threaten them, lest you be added to a different kind of list…

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      As a Democrat, I agree.

      But I kinda want to see how deep this goes.

      WhiteDudesWhoLikeFriesInTheirMilkshakes4Harris .com

      PuertoRicansWhoAreOkayWithTacoBell4Harris .com

      BlackAnimeFansWhoAreCasualFansNotLikeThatWeirdShitLikeMyWifeIsADogFromAnotherWorld4Harris .com

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s a pretty relevant distinction within American life. I’m no strategist, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The only people who think race don’t matter is people who exclusively interact within the same race.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s a social construct that didn’t exist until the 1600s, but it’s a real social construct.

          Outside America and other former plantation economies it can be a bit different, and less in-your-face, but it’s almost always still there.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s not purely a social construct, I hate this stupid idea. It’s a phenotype. Babies do not have a randomized skin color at birth, it depends on their ancestry. Calling that a “social construct” is arguably racist in itself.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Skin colour is a complete continuum, and one which doesn’t very in any uniform way based on geography, aside from the darkest people coming recently from Africa.

              By this logic, ear size is a race.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yes! You’re getting it. Ear size is an aspect of race. As is hair texture and height and all the other inheritable phenotypes. Skin color is just the most visibly obvious one.

                • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Well, words can mean whatever you want, but usually race refers to the discrete-ish social categories that have been constructed based roughly on specific phenotypes. For example Black people were a discrete legal category for most of America’s history, and were nominally 3/5 of a person and treated as much less. Now, they have equal legal rights on paper, but the category remains informally.

                • barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So you’re saying race == phenotype? Then you also have to say that race is a continuum, and, therefore, any arbitrary line on that continuum a social construct.

                  Which is btw blindingly obvious to Europeans, Harris is white in my book: There’s plenty of Italians with darker skin. Funny how perception changes if you actually consider skin colour to be skin colour and not some grand overarching signifier for an in reality culturally defined group.