• ditty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This, and we need to reincorporate female trees in urban areas to reduce the rampant pollen pollution caused by exclusively using male trees 🤧

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        News to me too… And I think it might be wrong but I don’t know enough to say with confidence.

        how I thought it works is that trees have male and female parts, but a single tree can have both parts. And some trees can self-pollinate.

        My uneducated guess is that it depends on the species, some are sexed and some are hermaphrodite. That’s how it goes in the animal kingdom.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The cleanup cost from the fruit is what’s prohibitive about that, leaving the fruit isn’t an option since it makes the sidewalks unusable from the mess, it rots and creates mold spores, pests, rodents, etc, they all thrive.

      Theres a very good argument to why they shouldn’t introduce females everywhere.

      And how’s the males supposed to know if they are pollinating something or not for that matter? It would be less trees making pollen, but there will still be pollen.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Also, letting the homeless and working class forage for the fruit would be way too egalitarian and compassionate. Totally unacceptable!

        • em2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Free food that drops out of the trees? Get the fuck outta here.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ideally the homeless wouldn’t exist in this scenario, and sure, the public can grab the bottom 8’? The public really can’t be trusted to safely use ladders, so that options right out.

          I’m all for it, but realistically it’s not a feasible solution? It’s to costly, wheter it be to collect it and give to public safely, or to provide ladders and medical care for the people who inevitably fall.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              … a non profit relies on donations, needs volounteers, or other source of income, so it’s either paid through taxes like I mentioned, or through money in the end anyways…?

              Sure I guess that works? Whatever makes you feel better, but it’s still the same scenario in the end.

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      ULPT: You can pretend your allergy is a cold and call in sick

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s like a lot of things in life. It depends and it can be complicated.

        Upfront costs for infrastructure besides the panels themselves is expensive and in places where electricity is already cheap companies won’t bother.

        You also have to conduct tests to ensure that the grid and transformers can handle more power, and if they can’t then you have more infrastructure that needs upgrades.

        I’m not saying we shouldn’t do this. We really need to in the long run but it isn’t something we can simply snap our fingers and do instantly.

        Also, a lot of the unprofitability comes from VC culture in my opinion. The individuals at the top of businesses often times won’t stick around with the business long enough to start see the savings from solar energy.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      “We would by lying, if we said that we were sorry that you don’t have sidewalks. However, we don’t care about pedestrians, we only care about cars and their vrooms, vrooms.” - Probably some city official.

  • Asclepiaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love that I was fortunate to get a home in an old urban neighborhood in a city that’s pretty good. The tree coverage in my hood is nuts. I see a few mature black walnuts and a ton of mature pines among all the other smaller trees. I can walk to the grocery store with 80% canopy coverage the entire way.

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Tell me more about your evil master plan to make the world a better place for everyone

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tell it to my neighbors, my tree has slowly become treeless, I planted one in the middle of my front yard so that the house can stay cool in the mornings

  • PaintedSnail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We used to have them until several years ago they were deliberately removed. Their roots were destroying the roads and sidewalks, as well as infiltrating the underground infrastructure.