I hate when arth give feelinga
Thank you. This post has haunted my brain on occasion over the years. I couldn’t remember the person’s reply, just the set-up and the joke. You have released me from my torment for the next two weeks until I forget again.
I can confirm. As a person who had a chihuahua for 11 beautiful years, he yearned for the most violent death of any and all that displeased him, which was anything bigger than him.
Is this a new format? I find this premium
Go back into shower, resume task
Someone made a post about how they thought they could fight a bear, describing exactly the scenario in the image.
I remember when this reddit post came out, it was as wild as that imaginary bear. Forgive my reminiscence, but I think I made a comment like “dude shut up I wanna see him do it” to someone saying that he shouldn’t, and it got several upvotes. A dozen, even. It was nice
Fuck, man, you know when a meme just hits you in a way you aren’t expecting? This one just footballed my funny groin.
Took the L on this one
True. The start of the 1900s was no time for messin’ around and making babies. We had to go work in the mines
Just like a beehive with mace, it’s unbearable
Fake: Open source is the most efficient way to get communities to push and develop technology. People gathering to discuss, work, and share solely for the interest of the subject, serves the subject. People putting in effort in exchange for resources will only be serving self-interest, and never be wholly dedicated to the project goal.
Gay: Capitalists are only interested in advancing technology for monetary gain; if reversing genuine improvement serves their greed, they will do (and have done) so.
Edit: double gay, most open source people are also wearing cute thigh high socks rn
Also, “Pierre” also means “rock” in french, so his name could be translated to “Stone Wolf Clawed”
It’s the same combination on my luggage!
Get in the depression region of collective human consciousness, Shinji
Ah, the art of bushit-o
I was saying temperature, not spiciness
The argument still stands; god is either incapable of creating a universe without suffering where you can still derive meaning, or is not willing to create one.
The only potential explanation I could see is the absolutes in which we set things. The paradox of an ultimate being is flawed (could god microwave a burrito so hot that not even he could eat it?) because it presumes that the being exists within the confines of two opposing absolutes cannot coexist; something either is, or isn’t. However, if some being would be considered supreme in our universe, it could be because it exists outside of its confinements, meaning that conflicting realities (paradoxes) are possible - the burrito is both not too hot for god to eat, while at the same still being too hot for him to eat. It’s just not possible for us to comprehend because in our understanding of reality, something cannot exist simultaneously as the opposite of what we’ve recognized it as. It would mean it either no longer fits the definition, or reality exists in a way that’s so much more complicated at the same time.
It’s often expressed in multiverses in a lot of fictional settings; a universe where god made a burrito so hot not even he could eat it, and a parallel universe where he could, and both universes are both observable and interactable with god. But even then, it’s kinda brain-melting, like some kind of nuclear-hot brain burrito.
I’m sorry, I’m kind of hungry.
Instructions unclear, reverted to feudalism, defended literal, inherited pile of manure with violence