Yeah. I personally think that a mathematical curve would address that.

Yeah. The little amount of financial literacy that I have, I got from experience; it was never taught to me by the school system.

Hmm, you are right. But this is not knowledge that is taught to us. So, the main problem is politicians limiting the information given, no?

deleted by creator

Thanks for the explanation, but keep in mind that this is not only about the US. I am Portuguese, and this is a problem here, AFAIK. Nonetheless, this would simplify the tax calculation.

Yeah. I guess the most important thing is to educate people, something that politicians haven’t done, because they know that people wouldn’t vote in them, if they were educated.

We need to rid our society of greed, jealousy, and hate. But that is also in our genetics, so it will take a lot of effort.

We (the people) desperately need to find a balanced solution, one that slowly makes people realize that capitalism hurts them, and that the only way is to make the richest people max. 3 times richer than the very poorest. And there should be a point where money is not a thing, anymore. However, that conclusion will only happen in decades, if not centuries.

But the Democrats are the lesser evil of two. Just because you vote in the lesser evil doesn’t mean you can’t fight it, later on. Bernie Sanders knew he most likely wouldn’t win, so he focused on fighting the Greater Evil: Trump, and the MAGA mob.

So, do those minority protections have to be implemented in the Constitution of the country itself?

I actually thought about including that (counting abstaining as voting for no party/leader) in the post, but the problem would be people voting for the Greater Evil, because they don’t really want to vote. But it would, indeed, lower the amount of people who don’t vote.

Use Mojeek, it has an independent index, and no problems, AFAIK.

I’m not even sure that we’ll ever get to that point. Plus, it’s not compatible with most hardware yet.

Nonetheless, I think that it is possible to modificate these cards, to have an upscaling chip inside it. But it would take some effort, which no company will ever do.

Ray Tracing is useless (unless it’s for animated movies or movies that use CGI), regular lighting is a lot better for performance, and it’s 80% as good as Ray Tracing, in comparison. I use a really bad laptop, yet it is possible to get 30 to 60 FPS, on decently optimized games.

Then, isn’t it best to say what you used the AI on, so that consumers can make even better choices?

The problem is that it’s being used to not optimize, when it should be to prolong the lifespan of computers, mostly older gaming rigs. If developers focused on optimizing and not on rushing things, a GTX 1080 Ti could probably handle AAA games at 1440p, high settings, at least at 60 FPS, and 140+ FPS with DLSS at quality. Keep in mind that I don’t blame most developers, but rather big corps, that do have partnerships with companies like Nvidia, that obviously want people constantly buying their GPUs.