It’s hard to control which Information other people get in a system where many servers share information like posts and comments. Think of it as throwing your post on a public wall. Everyone that walks by will be able to see it.

It’s (relatively) easy to control what information you want to see. Or at least information from which sources you want to see, or not see.

Something something causality, fate is a spiral, something

Nah, tail recursion optimization can just reuse the same stack frame again and again. It’s going to loop until it wraps around what ever integer width it has and then tells you if the biggest integer is even or odd. Or, if it’s nice, it’s going to complain about the wrap around

so a male owl would probably not care about a females wingspan, much like in humans 👀

Wait, you people don’t care about your partners wingspan?

Did boss baby raise fears in parents that they might have to explain procreation? If no, then two mothers shouldn’t.

And just telling a kid that every constellation of parents are possible, it’s just that some matchups are more common than others doesn’t seem like daunting task.

Nettles are great! Just dont get the cordage wet, it will get very loose. Maybe there’s a way to treat it against that?

Anyways, rubbing that pile in your hands will release a lot of the green flakey stuff an little knots that remain, if you’ve got the time and patience I recommend it.

You need to come down from the flagpole

Isn’t that going to make playing ADC way easier? I always had problems with the fast mouse actions involved in positioning and attacking

Oh yeah, the current rust work is about giving drivers access to the core abstractions of the kernel

Gotta keep a distance to that dirty unsafe code!

The 1% that allows Linux to run on the New macbooks if i understand asahi Linux correctly

The distraction machinery definitely uses bots and it seems like an easy strategy to just reuse posts that did well. Not saying that this definitely is part of that. But I’d be careful with sentences like “It has nothing to do with Epstein on any level.”

And then you get an invite from a person you would have thought you aren’t friends with, based on their behavior. Time to start a game I like to call: “Is it an invite out of politeness/because of a social norm I’m missing or is this an actual invite because we are friends and I missed that”

The only thing I’m missing in the CLI is easy picking and choosing which change to include in a commit on a more fine grained basis than files. I sometimes have a changed file and the changes fix different issues and thus should get separate commits but with the CLI I can’t easily select the changes to be staged. At least not AFAIK.

Edit: Richards law of posting something wrong to get fast correct answers seems to stay true, even on lemmy. Thanks for teaching me something today <3

New eldritch horror: incomprehensibly wide yeast dough

Well click-through is getting worse and worse the more search engines just give answers themselves without losing you to the actual websites. This must also or even especially affect reddits ability to capitalize the user generated content through ads. Not sure if trying to enter a field that is currently killing itself by showing ai summaries instead of search results is a good move though…

You are not great at logic and analogies, are you?

Well if there can be good tenants and bad tenants, surely there can be good landlords and bad landlords, or is that not possible, all of them are automatically evil?

All of them do earn money just by owning property. I’m not calling that evil or good or bad. It is what it is. And I’m sure many landlords are nice enough people. I am against it though.

So by that logic, VPNs and Bitcoin should both be illegal because they can be used by criminals (even though they have legitimate uses too) because the underlying mechanism is the same

I’m not even sure where to begin. Neither of those, VPN nor Bitcoin, allow you to earn money simply by owning property. Both of them can be used legally and illegally, but that has nothing to do with landlords which are always able to rent out their property completly legally but are still always being a parasite. I’m not saying renting should be banned because one kind of landlords are evil and the others aren’t. I’m saying the mechanism of profiting off of property while exploiting the need for housing puts all of them on a spectrum between siphoning off a little or siphoning off a lot of the workers income.

So bad tenants being excused from any culpability means that all landlords are automatically evil no matter what?

Noones talking about excusing bad tenants. Stop building strawmen.

So you’re saying that poor people should just… not live anywhere and instead should live on the street? I’m not sure I get your point, because if that is your point, it’s not a very good one.

Or should those people just live on the street?

If you’d bothered to read my comment you’d have seen this:

Also, and this might be a weird stance for americans, I don’t think anyone should be facing the choice of being able to pay rent and ending homeless on the street.

Landlords, yes even the nice old man renting out his spare room, are making money simply because they already own property. Of course there is a spectrum between those and large corporations. But the underlying mechanism is still the same.

Is not living on the street not really something of value? I feel that is something of value, isn’t it?

Just compare it to buying property where you continously pay off your credit. You get something in return, ownership of a property. Just because you are too poor to afford that, thus being forced ot pay rent, you receive significantly less for the money you spend on housing. Also, and this might be a weird stance for americans, I don’t think anyone should be facing the choice of being able to pay rent and ending homeless on the street.

I dunno, I don’t have any interest in becoming a landlord but I commonly see people considering them as the most evil people in the world no matter what and it does confuse me a little bit.

They commonly siphon off income from workers to keep their properties value up. This is just pararsitic behaviour.

People always say landlords are always evil, but there are tenants who are weeks or months late on their rent, they destroy the place, etc, it doesn’t seem like such a dream job to me.

So bad tenants are an excuse to be an evil parasite towards every tenant there is? Also, being a landlord isn’t just a job. It is making more money from existing property by exploiting the need of housing of those that are not able to afford a place themselves.

It would still be someone else paying you to keep your properties value up while receiving nothing of value for their money. You wouldn’t be on the same level as an intentionally evil landlord. Just be aware that you would still be siphoning money from a worker into your pocket.