Anyway, about Death to America, check out this clip, I timestamped it.

Of course, I pulled all of that out of my ass. Just trying to give you my honest understanding of your state of mind, based on the exchanges on this post.

You basically said “I don’t wanna hear it”, after they tried to overcome your very idea, that they must have meant to kill the people of the USA. An idea so wild, that it only can be manifested through completely equating the citizens of a nation state with the nation state itself.

Being nationalist is a default state of mind in this world of nation states, it’s what states do, they nurture a national identity within their citizens. Saying you are nationalist is not necessarily an attack, but mostly a description. People tend to take it as an attack, because they have a vague idea, that identifying with their state a bit too much is a bad thing.

So you reject the idea, yet you act on it.
You can’t stand the idea of someone wishing for your nation state to vanish. Because you identify with it.

So you make up vibes-based arguments like
“this guy is an accelerationist” - judged based on what now?;
“they want to kill all citizens” - which is a thought only in your head; and
“people outside of the USA will get hurt, if it suddenly seizes to exist” - nobody said that, that’s unrealistic. But we could discuss the topic. Empires do end, people get hurt, sure. But people around the world get hurt every fucking day because of its sole existence and it’s not getting any better, so it’s a moot argument, if you don’t actually qualify your take. You don’t, tho, because it’s just a vibe. It’s not based on logic or knowledge, you just don’t like the idea.

All you do is complain based on opposition to what you feel. And from outside, you seem to not like the idea of America going down the drain … it seems like you can’t even conceptualize the idea or have a realistic understanding of what the US actually is in the world order, so it’s hard to even discuss it with you.

You don’t need to agree with me, it’s just an interpretation of my perception of your engagement. I’m also not going for a back-and-forth now. Take it or leave it.

Not trying to offend, take it as a perspective from outside.

You have a nationalist mindset and are identifying so much with it your nation state, that you‘re automatically equating it with the people living there (mostly themselves oppressed mind you) and jump straight to projection of what would happen, because it‘s exactly what your nation state has done throughout its history, your logical conclusion — war, destruction, mass murder.

Nobody said that, nobody meant that, nobody wants that, but you got triggered, because your first instinct is to be a proud American. You think that about sums it up?

Thankfully, I am not your pupil. If you’re not able to make an argument without sending people off to read into your own philosophies, you ultimately failed to make an argument.

You’re’ making a categorical error, as this thread is about an Automaton having direct, tangible real-world consequences for people’s live trajectory. It’s not about the legitimacy of the educational system itself, not about the relevance of grades. If it was, I would probably even agree with you.

Now, that your initial, ideological take has been rebuked after the very first try, you keep arguing a strawman from a privileged position of survivorship bias, with an outdated anecdote and an absolute refusal to acknowledge differential vulnerability, by reducing your pompous deliberations about systemic rot into individual failure. Effectively a cruel form of victim-blaming disguised as enlightenment. And probably one of the most US-American things to do.

But what is it now, the failure of the system or of the individual? Because your argument seems to be condemning the system as irredeemably corrupt, yet simultaneously you blame individuals for not transcending it. If the system is so rotten, how can individual failure to escape it be a moral failing? Of course you can’t escape that contradiction without exposing your very own misanthropic disgust for those that didn’t manage.

You, the irrelevant comet in my orbit, only drift further off into the void now, by distorting the problem of a 7% false-positive rate on a life-altering accusation into a one in a million (0.0001%) chance of terrible application of technology. Mixed with unfounded empirical claims about the material conditions about the labor market in the 21 century and spiteful jabs at potential live choices of the ones falling through the cracks.

Your attempts to claim authority are merely furthering your illegitimacy as a serious person. You’re dismissed. Off you go, lil’ irrelevant comet.

Calling a one-liner a thesis after trying to make an argument with long-winded, but ultimately empty autobiographical babble — like an ugly accident one cannot look away from, this just keeps pulling me in.

So, how does the anecdotal, badly written life story of a self-absorbed ego going through a midlife crisis relate to the reality of people getting their lives fucked through some automated allegation machine? Would you, maybe, condense your point into a simple sentence? So that even irrelevant comets are able to get it and to also showcase your moral blindness towards systemic dangers, just because you managed to get through, back in the good ol’ days. Dangers that, as pointed out already and contrary to you own experience, will have life changing consequences for other people. That’d be great.

And now you‘re trying to impress the empty ether with your irrelevant doodles from back when.

Just like you keep dwelling on your own trivial creations, you keep lingering in conversations you should’ve put behind you eons ago.

My humble guess is: the massive gravitational center of any orbit you’ve ever calculated has always been your ego.

ignorant self-centered anecdote. Too long, no relevance

That‘s the actual critique. But of course you‘d focus on the grade given.

Traits of the ignorant, as one would expect.

Holy the ignorant self-centered anecdote. Too long, no relevance, do not recommend. I‘d probably give it a failing grade.

deleted by creator

edit: Alright, as I’m not willing to die on that dumb Rothschild hill, I’m withdrawing.

That being said practically every western country operates under that mantra

You are right, but there‘s no viable path to shift responsibility away from the US.

Because every western country acts through capitalist forces and under US hegemony, which will enforce capitalist rule or try to kill you off. Which western country do you think plays a sovereign role here?

Obama is a war criminal, he should be trialed before an international court and consequently jailed, not having libraries bear his name. It seems hard to compute for Americans especially, but really, it‘s not that complicated.

Deleting photos on SM / the open internet is one thing — what I worry about are all the photos in seemingly private (big tech) cloud storage. Pretty sure Google has quite a few pictures of me, although I personally never uploaded them. I know, that Microsoft got mine, as for a good part of my life I chose OneDrive as a cheap and seemingly secure solution.

Good luck getting your friends and family to explicitly not backup photos you yourself are in.

Shit‘s mad.

There’s a nice nature video about this as well, for whomever the articles might be a bit dry.

You talk about regression, I talk about progression, we are not the same.

Seems more like you are scared to actually progress intellectually.

The more interesting question would be, why the UFC is supporting a fascist regime and what kind of action antifascist fans will take and which kind of individuals are openly boycotting this kind of endorsement. Any?

The content of that picture does not support your claim in any way. Also, it’s from a straight up western cyber security and intelligence think tank. This is not a source, it’s narrative shaping.

Provide a serious source, this shit ain’t it. Right now, as far as I’m concerned, you’re spreading desinformation.