I like that you didn’t even settle on one, you’re just like “I don’t like this😭😭😭, let me grab a few misc words and chain them together”.
I mean, I get it. There’s no meaning behind the message so you have to put together several fake meanings and hope they stick.
Accurate, meat is universally gross
It makes the road surface slicker, as I said.
Nowhere did I support Texas
Nowhere did I say the way that crosswalks are is bad
I said maybe having a slicker than usual stretch of road leading up to a crosswalk would be bad, which isn’t what’s happening
What’s more, you literally have a response next to mine on this subthread where you are clearly in agreement with me.
Should be illegal everywhere
Based on a sample of 1, we have determined that the human race should no longer exist.
Goodbye
Your words say leaders but your words say not leaders
Not forgotten, just not relevant
Another solid argument that gets right to the real point of all this.
Makes sense, thanks for the explanation
No, he said everything else is some type of castle. I looked this castle up and it aligns well with the idea that he’s trying to shut down the other claims without considering them.
From the wiki:
where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”)
So he’s technically saying that the rest of the post is modest claims which are easy to defend, ie he agrees with Y. (I’m assuming the bailey is genocide and the motte is the claims of ethnic cleansing w/out genocide)
Shouldnt this be “improve on the silence”? If you talk there is not silence so you cannot improve the silence by talking. But you can improve on the silence with good words making.
Says the person who deliberately called themselves sweet fart
That’s too bad, because neither of those is the case. I personally think your attempt to kill the conversation above with your “stop typing” and again now with this comment is an actually an attempt to hide your head in the sand, but I guess we’ll never know.
Valuable addition. I ask “why is that inference wrong” and you say “no”.
If there’s a permanent global fingerprint code isn’t that, well, the opposite of what the marketing says? Why is that not a unique user identifier?
I didn’t compare it to signal. I just asked if that was the facts of the situation.
If I were to compare it might be to the topic of this thread which I can self host and thus control.
However, since you opened the door on signal I’d comment that the entire signal org would have to go down for that to happen, not just a few servers. Is simplex managed by a large well funded entity that is unlikely to fail or are the servers more mom & pop setups? What happens if Kurt Cobain wakes up one morning and shuts down his server?
Well then why did you say the rest of the post of the person you’re responding to doesn’t matter? You did say that, didn’t you? You told them to stop and that their argument is faulty, but didn’t deny the actual claims. That implies to me you don’t care. If you do care, you did an extremely poor job of showing it by telling them to stop talking.
So if the above is so completely off base, why don’t you continue your argument with the poster above?
Ok let’s ignore that for a second and focus in on your homophobia. What precisely about that message is homophobic?