• 37 Posts
  • 581 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2024

help-circle




  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.orgtoScience Memes@mander.xyzSpicy Air ☢️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    First, props for actually engaging with my question and finding out.

    Now to the rest of your comment:

    That might be flippant, but does this matter at all?

    Yes? As I said: here in central Europe (and Chernobyl is not central europe, I meant parts of Germany, Czech Republic, Poland and Austria, so not really close) we still have areas, 40 years after the event, with too high radioactive levels in e.g. mushrooms for safe human consumption. I personally don’t really find that cool. Same is happening in Fukushima, but in a more local event due to the wind pushing most into the sea.
    So we just have those nuclear meltdown events and then move around outside the areas where the failures happened? That is your preferred mode of living in the future? I envision a much more positive future for mankind.

    You might as well say solar panels are deadly because some idiot didn’t tie his safety line while installing rooftop solar panels.

    Yes? That’s how it works? Those kind of things have to be considered to properly judge a technology. And thank you for proving my point. What happens if a solar cell\battery\transformator fails catastrophically? A house burns down and the people inside might die. Tragic, but nothing that stops humanity from using the local area for the next hundreds or thousands of years, depending on how bad it is. And still fucking up food resources in a wider area outside the local area depending on how lucky the non-locals are with the weather conditions.

    We sadly don’t live in a perfect world where everything goes right, so failure rates and failure modes have to be considered. In fact, those two things are kind of the main things you have to think about. At least if you want to engage seriously with a topic as engineer. And even the oh so perfect and advanced Japan was not safe. And why? Because of human error.

    In addition I would like to point your view to the current Ukraine war where Russia (and Ukraine afterwards) attacked right next to a nuclear plant (you could even watch the fights live yourself via the webcams at the nuclear plants, which is still bonkers to me), which isn’t exactly filling me with confidence. Furthermore I would like to point out the shitstained Florida Orange and his administration in the USA, which has shown time and time again their disregard for science and any and all safety measures. Do you seriously want to tell me, that you think those kind of people will never come into power again and threaten our and humanities safety because they have the ego of a planet but the brains of a mosquito? They fired the people responsible for nuclear weapons in the DoE and only afterwards realised it and tried to reverse it after the media reported their epic failure. Did you forget about those parts already?

    Do you seriously want to tell me that you engage with your life only considering the best case scenario? That is not how reality works, sadly.

    And just to add to your answer regarding the fuel: not being able to stack radioactive fuel together is exactly one of the problems, as you should know.


  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.orgtoScience Memes@mander.xyzSpicy Air ☢️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    As you said: easy to answer, so not worth it to engage with seriously.

    So let me counter ask you a very similar question: how much radioactive material (weight or volume, your choice) do you think was spread in Chernobyl, that made it still a closed off region today and resulted in ongoing increased radioactive levels in mushrooms and wild boar meat in multiple regions over central Europe, that it is still not considered safe for human consumption?

    Spoiler: radioactive fuel is energy efficient, as you said, but that also means that it only takes a small amount to contaminate a larger area.









  • Wrufieotnak@feddit.orgtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldYeah right...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    They also seemed to have set positions for photographers to get his picture as he raises his fist with the flag in the background.

    I haven’t watched videos of that attempt, but has Trump moved from his position after the shot? If not, I don’t see it as implausible that they positioned a photographer in advance to get the flag in the background. That one is explainable, we are talking about the country that has its flag fucking everywhere, even on underwear.

    I find the fact that they took the foto at all after the “attempt” as one of the biggest proofs that trump was not really scared about the situation.