I mean, that’s a cool looking QR code that I’ve never seen before, which I suppose is technology related, but, other than that, I have no idea wtf this post is even supposed to be.
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
I mean, that’s a cool looking QR code that I’ve never seen before, which I suppose is technology related, but, other than that, I have no idea wtf this post is even supposed to be.
You can, at least, do that externally through RSS:
Honestly, from a day to day standpoint, by my experience of using both, there’s little practical difference between, for example, yay
, and paru
— it mostly just ends up coming down to subjective, nitpicky meta things about the program itself.
Up until this post, I hadn’t heard of Aura, but, after briefly looking at its repo, it appears that it’s effectively the same as yay
and paru
[1.2]; what it tries to do differently is it tries to ensure that there are translations of it (I’m guessing its output) in other languages [1.1.1]. One thing that I’m knee-jerk not super fond of is that it utilizes its own centralized metadata server [1.1.2], though I admit that I haven’t thought about that a great deal, so perhaps there are some aspects that about it that I’m missing, or perhaps misunderstanding, or perhaps there’s a different way to view it.
[…] From the beginning, Aura has been built with multiple-language support in mind […]
Aura has its own […] Metadata Server called the Faur. The Faur in particular helps reduce traffic to the main AUR server and allows us to provide unique package lookup schemes not otherwise available.
Aura is a package manager for Arch Linux. Its original purpose was in supplementing Pacman to support the building of AUR packages […].
At least the two hemispheres are separated.
That isn’t what I meant — if I am understanding your comment to mean that you thought that I was saying that skincare is feminine so people who avoid feminine things should avoid skincare. I was saying that people shouldn’t fear something due to its perceived femininity or masculinity — the hypothetical fact that skincare is feminine should be of no consequence to one’s own interest in it.
Thank you for the community recommendation!
Men, it’s okay to care about your skin. It’s not feminine, it’s human.
I find the “feminine” premise of this argument silly. So what if it is feminine? Is there something inherently wrong with femininity? It’s one thing to simply be somewhere on the spectrum of femininity and masculinity, but it’s another to fear that position and to force another based on one’s insecurity of the perceptions of others.
Pretty much all of the world of Hollow Knight — ie Hallownest. It’s just such a cool and immersive world. It contains such cool architecture, design, and environments.
Roasting community?
Lemmy_at_em rolls off the tongue better, imo.
That’s a lot.
Do you mean that something in my routine is unnecessary? Or are you simply stating that, subjectively, it feels like a lot?
Your post is basically an advertising campaign for several of these products.
Is it? I only stated the products that I use for the purpose of clarity, example, and critique.
But by far the majority will be just fine without them.
This is conjecture.
The human body had millions of years to evolve to a point where companies seem to think they can replace essential functions of it?
That’s partially the purpose of modern medicine [1].
Medicine is the science and practice of caring for patients, managing the diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, treatment, palliation of their injury or disease, and promoting their health. Medicine encompasses a variety of health care practices evolved to maintain and restore health by the prevention and treatment of illness.
You missed the word “some”.
No, I didn’t.
Ha, yeah, I know I’m being pedantic, but I strive to be precise and consistent in my word use.
When did we reach the point of deep fried Tintin?