• Syrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think any of the nations who call themselves “communists” can actually be considered communist. Hell, most of them are pretty much dictatorships, which is the farthest you can get from communism.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If were gonna start arguing semantics though, then what is pure capitalism? As even the US has limits on what capitalist shenanigans they draw the lines on. Ie policies like antitrust laws, which are explicitly to prevent monopolies, because while capitalism strive for monopolies, monopolies also usually kill the market so…

      The answer is obviously socialism when defined as the government owning or regulating the means of production, meaning just regulation is enough no need to own them.

      Communism doesn’t work yet because we can’t seem to plan resources use for large economies as efficiently as organic markets do it.

      But unregulated markets just destroy themselves, end up overexpensive enshittified adfests trying to push subpar products to you that won’t last you even the walk home.

      Capitalism is like the cancerous form of market economies.

      And communism has historically been about as healthy as the vegan diet of a nutritionally uninformed anemic teenager. Its not bad as an idea, but market economies just work better when they’re properly regulated.

      I’d definitely argue with you that countries like China aren’t actually communist.

      https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/capitalism-with-chinese-characteristics/CECD36DB2C3623DEE4670F7897BAA3CB