• friendlymessage@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They can accuse you without a breathalyzer test as well and they can fake blood tests just as well as a breathalyzer test. If you assume the police are just gonna plant evidence, refusing a breathalyzer test will do nothing.

    CaptnNMorgan clearly stated, that they recommend taking the test at the station because of the time to get there, indicating that it’s about degradation of the blood alcohol level. They’re clearly showing that it’s not about innocent people being wrongfully accused. I know ACAB, yadda yadda, that doesn’t mean everyone accused by the police is a saint. Some people are just assholes and anyone driving drunk should get the book thrown at them. Including of course off-duty cops.

    • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nobody should drive drunk, but everyone has a different tolerance. Someone can blow a high number and not even feel buzzed, if their tolerance is high. I’m not talking to bad people who don’t care about other lives, I’m talking to people who would otherwise be taken advantage of by the police and their obtuse laws.

      • friendlymessage@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Dude, you’re literally defending drunk driving. Please educate yourself on the effect of alcohol on decision making and reaction speed. Just because someone thinks they’re not impaired doesn’t mean it’s true and how they feel doesn’t play any role in it whatsoever

        • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Bro, there is a difference between being drunk and not realizing it, and being sober while blowing a high number.

            • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              You are wrong. Someone with a high tolerance won’t be drunk, but they’ll have the same amount of alcohol in their blood as someone who is wasted and has a low tolerance.

              • friendlymessage@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                You should not drive at a fairly low blood alcohol level either. Reaction time and decision making abilities are limited even if you don’t feel anything continuously. Although, I get the feeling that you’re not capable of making good decisions while being sober either, so maybe for you it doesn’t make a difference.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              “I drive better after a couple drinks, it loosens me up but I’m not even buzzed.”