Reason I’m asking is because I have an aunt that owns like maybe 3 - 5 (not sure the exact amount) small townhouses around the city (well, when I say “city” think of like the areas around a city where theres no tall buildings, but only small 2-3 stories single family homes in the neighborhood) and have these houses up for rent, and honestly, my aunt and her husband doesn’t seem like a terrible people. They still work a normal job, and have to pay taxes like everyone else have to. They still have their own debts to pay. I’m not sure exactly how, but my parents say they did a combination of saving up money and taking loans from banks to be able to buy these properties, fix them, then put them up for rent. They don’t overcharge, and usually charge slightly below the market to retain tenants, and fix things (or hire people to fix things) when their tenants request them.

I mean, they are just trying to survive in this capitalistic world. They wanna save up for retirement, and fund their kids to college, and leave something for their kids, so they have less of stress in life. I don’t see them as bad people. I mean, its not like they own multiple apartment buildings, or doing excessive wealth hoarding.

Do leftists mean people like my aunt too? Or are they an exception to the “landlords are bad” sentinment?

  • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    A single home owner does not expect to profit from that investment

    What are you talking about? People definitely buy homes as an investment so that they can sell it and retire.

    increase in value provides the means to move to a new home

    What is this, if not profiting off an investment?

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      What are you talking about? People definitely buy homes as an investment so that they can sell it and retire.

      That’s insurance. The “profit” goal is not to rent seek or enrich themselves. And in this market it’s a risky gamble, anyways.

      If the so called profit is intended to be entirely consumed to take care of moving or retiring, it’s insurance to allow you to move or retire; it’s not profit you add to your income. It’s not even properly described as “profit” since it’s, by definition, unrealized gains.

      These are not circumstances where you “cash out” and buy something fancy, or even pay your day to day bills. Context matters.