• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I use this shit on a daily basis at work. They work well, as long as you’re choosing the right models, making the right engineering decisions, and have a good set of baseline rules.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Do you have a guide on which baseline rules are good? I use Claude Opus 5.5 at work and while it’s definitely more helpful than not having it, it also does some incredibly baffling things that a human would realize immediately are unproductive.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Baseline” is subjective, so I’d recommend just start a global rules file and steer it away from the behaviors you don’t like. Don’t be afraid of quizzing the agent itself on why it did that thing, and what’s a good bit of language to add to the rules file to prevent it from happening.

        Also, for specific tasks, skill files are really useful, and LLMs can write the whole thing, based on what you did the hard way in a session. Same thing for triggering a skill file and then ask it if there are any useful improvements to make to the skills file in the future, at the end of the session.