Ive been interested in computers for 4 years or so. And I love computer science concepts and free software. I know design difference between X11 and Wayland protocols, garbage collectors and other random facts i remembered.

But i have never done any serious programming. Only some little attempts at python, godot, c++, kotlin and so on. Idk why but when i have to do the actual programming i just dont know how, documentation feels unclear and those youtube programming courses also do not ensentivize it.

If someone here had similar problem, how did you solve it?

  • sbird@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you want to try game development, game jams are always a fun experience! Godot is an excellent for this and is what I use (GDScript is very nice, less resource heavy compared to the proprietary options too). As for guides, GDQuest and HeartBeast are awesome!

    There are a bazillion different online resources to learn programming, whether you want to make websites, mobile apps, whatever. As long is it’s not an obvious cashgrab (a small fee to support them is fine!)

    Personally, I learnt Python by reading a book. Dunno which one, but it was a very good book!

    And don’t be afraid to search for the answer (p.s. Google is not your friend, but Ecosia and Qwant are!), I still sometimes forget how to make a for loop in Python. Try to avoid using LLMs if you can, they often promote not so good programming practices or are simply flat out wrong (and confidently so!). The only instance where it could be useful is explaining concepts to you in your native language if you are not a first language speaker of English (not vibe coding, mind you, that helps nobody!), but again, you have to be mindful that it often gets stuff super wrong!

    • SlumDogGazillionaire@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Question regarding the use of LLMs, what are your thoughts of using prompts that discourage it from providing code and just being there to guide when you’re going tremendously off the beaten path? For example, asking for the documentation of what you’re trying to achieve and to just nudge you in the right direction? Recently I started meeting with tutors and found that every single one has been trying to push me to use an LLM which really defeats the purpose of tutoring. I’m getting discouraged and thinking this might be the new norm for teaching.

      • sbird@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Personally, LLMs are too often wrong and overly confident to be useful for me. Plus, unless you’re running a local model, yet another subscription is not fun, especially by the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic. And you have all the ethical issues with LLMs that I’m sure you’ve heard about already.

        It would be much better if you used the vast swath of online resources we are very lucky to have nowadays, don’t take it for granted as the internet becomes increasingly saturated with low-effort LLM generated garbage.

        Again, the only scenario where LLMs are potentially useful is translation in my opinion, and even then, you have to mindful it is often pretty wrong.

        • SlumDogGazillionaire@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Appreciate the insight. It’s becoming pretty disheartening to work directly with a knowledgeable person only to hear “have you tried ChatGPT?”. The whole point is to be mentored and not have questions rerouted to something that’s generally wrong a vast majority of the time, and that’s not even factoring in all the unethical uses of AI.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not wrong the vast majority of the time. In fact, it’s petty damn good at explaining principles and giving feedback on code, but it doesn’t read minds, and so it can be wrong sometimes. It sometimes tells you you’re wrong while explaining the exact same thing you just told it back to it.

            People can be wrong, too. I just saw a teacher explain something wrong in my daughter’s online school video. She had the right answer but explained it wrong and confused my daughter. I think it’s fine to prefer human assistance, but AI is really good at having infinite patience and stepping back and covering fundamentals when you aren’t ready to understand a thing.

            My point is: however you find the answers you are seeking when confused, keep seeking. Keep asking questions. Keep experimenting.