If you do feel it is justified, apply a litmus test: would it still be acceptable if it was done by [insert someone you hate here].
Woah, woah. Slow down there pardner. You’re trying to teach leopard sensitivity training to someone who can’t perceive a leopard until their face is halfway chewed off.
Shame on you. The empathy impaired are people too, and they can’t be held accountable to awareness of rights that are not directly benefitting them at the moment.
Woah, woah. Slow down there pardner. You’re trying to teach leopard sensitivity training to someone who can’t perceive a leopard until their face is halfway chewed off.
Shame on you. The empathy impaired are people too, and they can’t be held accountable to awareness of rights that are not directly benefitting them at the moment.
Unlike the clear and present reasons why journalists must be allowed to question the powerful, you’re gonna have to provide evidence for this one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinkerbell_effect
That just seems like magical thinking with extra steps.
That was indeed the joke, yes.
In case it needs to be said, my participation up until this point has been 100% sarcasm. I am quite full of shit and wish you an excellent evening.