cm0002@midwest.social to Linux@programming.dev · 5 days agoVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down12cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.devlinux@sh.itjust.workslinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comcm0002@midwest.social to Linux@programming.dev · 5 days agomessage-square18linkfedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.devlinux@sh.itjust.workslinux@lemmy.world
minus-squareterabyterex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·5 days agook, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoI did not take that implication from their post. I don’t think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation.
ok, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition
I did not take that implication from their post. I don’t think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation.