fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 24 天前Growthmander.xyzimagemessage-square185linkfedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageGrowthmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 24 天前message-square185linkfedilink
minus-squareZombie-Mantis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·23 天前That they thought “bisexual” excluded furries, and “pansexual” included furries.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·23 天前Makes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys
minus-squareZombie-Mantis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·23 天前I once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·17 天前“Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.
minus-squareTaleya@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 天前Its a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.
minus-squareheartSagan5@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 天前They don’t discriminate, like at all?
What does this even mean?
That they thought “bisexual” excluded furries, and “pansexual” included furries.
Why would anyone…? Huh?
Makes about as much sense as people who think bisexuality excludes trans and enbys
I once knew a lady who thought pansexual meant “everything,” and specifically actual animals. I had to explain that it’s just bisexual but more.
“Bi-” doesn’t exclude them, but “pan-” exists to explicitly include them. Those aren’t the same thing.
Its a meaningless distinction. We have more important fucking things to fight than whether or not you like old Queer terminology.
They don’t discriminate, like at all?
deleted by creator