• Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    ok that’s just the claim again. i read about historical zionism in the context of palestine, and with what i read even just on wikipedia i’m inclined to believe what you’re saying is true.

    still, comments on the internet are quite impactful sometimes, and i believe you should add a source when making a non-obvious claim

      • Štěpán@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        oh i read that as a call to boycott google and some google’s agreement.

        i might be dumb one in a thousand, but a period after the first sentence would help.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          nah, the keming and the fonts tend toward your interpretation just from casual reading. you have to distinguish the beginning of each new clause somehow.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              no worries. a line, a bit more of a gap before google, a font change, something to tell me i’m reading a new sentence there. I know i’m the last one to talk about punctuation as i ignore most of the rules, but something would help to remind me i’m googling the [haasvara? spelling from memory in my replies it’s been a month] agreement, not boycotting google (the folk you’re reaching are already doing as much of that as they can probably, but i’ll admit to projecting here).