The revocation program, plans for which were first reported by the AP in February, soon will be greatly expanded to cover parents who owe more than $2,500 in unpaid child support — the threshold set by a little-enforced 1996 law, the State Department said.

  • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The majority of Americans don’t have passports, what has a passport got to do with it?

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They’re trying to require people to prove citizenship in order to vote. If this policy happens and that requirement becomes the law of the land, Boom, poor people poll tax. If you only think of each thing that’s happening as an island that can’t change anything else, you’re going to miss the forest for the trees.

      • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This only makes sense if a more significant portion of the people they want to disenfranchise only have passports than the people they want to favour.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As a European this sounds weird.
        Everyone needs to take their ID when we vote.
        We have to take the letter they send to you personally too.

        • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, and here in the US we don’t have a national ID (cause “muh freedum”), so it’s the government’s job to prove you don’t have the right to vote. You show up at your polling place, you either are already registered and just need to give your name and they confirm some stuff and then you go vote. Some states (like mine) have same day registration, so you bring some verifiable mail (like a bill) that proves where you live and then you can vote with a provisional ballet (which will get tossed if you attempted to vote illegally) and that’s it. Don’t need an ID for any of that. The punishments for voter fraud are very high, so the risk-reward for falsely presenting yourself as someone else to vote basically doesn’t happen, and when it does the person is usually caught.

          US politicians act like voter ID is just common sense, but it is effectively an unnecessary barrier to voting since all of the info the ID would give, the government already has and uses to verify who you are.

          If we had a national ID that was freely available to all, absolutely agreed that it would make sense, but we don’t got that. We couldn’t even get that in response to 9/11, so it’ll never happen.