Diabetic '93 Bowser Doug Ford is a shitty person. Who could’ve guessed? Couldn’t let Not Just Bikes give your cities free positive press, huh?

Literally nothing was added to this by using ai to make the person fat. Accelerating the burning of the world cause you don’t trust your joke to work unless you make the guy fat. Pathetic, man.

Hoard your intelligence, don’t rot for nothing.

Sikh already got this one on lock.

My variant is “any god who requires me to suck his cock to get to the good place is a giant dick, undeserving of praise nor respect. Any god I’d bother to worship wouldn’t care if I did or not”

It’s three. The hole through the center makes a hole around it inside the mug. Your topologist friend took too quick a glance at this.

This is a weird fantasy you’ve cooked up here. Umm, you doing okay?

I mean, the better solution is for everyone to get benefits with no taper. That way there’s never any trap and no one has to worry about covering essentials.

Nah. It was the correct word choice. They can condemn till they’re blue in the face. Every time they fear monger about socialism while talking about democratic socialists, they’re selling both concepts to Americans.

Nope. Don’t fucking do this. Do not comply in advance.

Reason is libertarian trash. They’ll always interpret any regulation in the most bad faith way.

Yes, it’s bad. It’s not super bad, or anything (this isn’t GoT) but the more you think about it, the less sense it makes. It mostly just rushed, not well thought out conclusions. Some conclusions create glaring plot holes (the upside-down explanation makes it impossible for the Russians to have opened a portal to the upside-down, for instance).

Mostly it commits the most egregious sin of not taking itself seriously. End of S4, shit is completely fucked in Hawkins with the ground being ripped up by the massive portals. Beginning of S5, the portals have been tacked over with sheet metal and never once matter.

Cause they don’t want to have to force corpos to get age verification on the ludicrous number of IoT devices that run Linux, but cover their ass in making it not seem that way.

Oh sorry. I mean… cause they’re, like, open-source and how could you even enforce that?

Other, better people have said this before.

Gotta sue for those, this is just charges being dropped.

Catholicism learned it’s lesson after Gallileo. They gotta make sure they’re right before they go accusing folks of heresy, now. That means scientists on the payroll.

No, I have the proof in this article of wrongdoing. Your argument hinges on this not being all the evidence used, sans proof. You’re the person asserting a claim without proof.

So yeah, you’re a pedo. Got it!

Why was this man’s license plate being tracked for him to be caught? If you can answer that question in a manner that implies the cops had suspicion before they did the license plate tracking then you’ve got a strong case that this gentleman’s 4th amendment rights weren’t violated.

But I don’t think there’s any way they knew to search his car where the first step wasn’t “Flock told us he goes to Michigan a lot” which, again, isn’t a crime nor is it suspicious. But more importantly, it means that the only justification for the search of the car came from an UNNECESSARY search of all the activities of all drivers in Brown County.

Yes, in public there’s no expectation of privacy, but that argument hinges on the idea that cops need to spend resources to follow people’s movements when they’re suspects in a crime. Recent SCOTUS cases have drawn the line that full sweep movement tracking could violate the fourth.

But the bigger deal here is how they knew where to be and when. They setup a sting because Flock pinged that he’d just crossed the border back from MI. So, based on Flock’s evidence that this man travels to MI, they began tracking his whereabouts OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. Reminder that reasonable suspicion of law breaking is required for tracking like that, but, more importantly, so is a warrant.

https://youtu.be/gmnL_Y9CsI0 video on Flock’s “legality” especially concerning unwarranted mass surveillance

Absence of evidence may be enough for you

I’m gonna hand you back this part of your argument. Trying to force me to prove a negative is a bad look and screams of desperation. But, if you do want to go down that road, I will remind you that you’ve never given proof that you’re not a pedophile and I find that very suspicious. Only pedophiles don’t have proof that they’re not pedophiles.

They arrested him in Wisconsin after laying an extremely illegal search trap for him.

They deeply broke the 4th amendment while doing nothing more than profiling a man for traveling. They then laid in wait for him to return to the city and performed an illegal search (illegal because the justification for said search comes from a 4th amendment violation) once they had him. Without the illegal search prior, they had no justification for the search that actually found the pot.

Even though he broke the law, there’s no way the conviction will stick because the cops fucked their case by doing this shit.