schizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square204linkfedilinkarrow-up1665arrow-down131file-textcross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldcars@lemmy.world
arrow-up1634arrow-down1external-link'It doesn’t catch fire': Why China’s "fireproof" sodium battery could be the breakthrough that makes EVs safer than ICE carswww.techradar.comschizoidman@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square204linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: science@lemmy.worldcars@lemmy.world
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·4 个月前You do realize that article neither negates or supports the above statement.
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 个月前“But Teslas are electric and Teslas are bad!” -the person we’re replying to. It’s like the commenter doesn’t realize there’s more electric cars than just Teslas.
minus-squareSaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 个月前Safer cars get into less crashes. You seriously want to argue semantics? https://www.tesladeaths.com/
minus-squareMalfeasant@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前There are electric cars that are not Teslas…
You do realize that article neither negates or supports the above statement.
“But Teslas are electric and Teslas are bad!” -the person we’re replying to.
It’s like the commenter doesn’t realize there’s more electric cars than just Teslas.
Safer cars get into less crashes. You seriously want to argue semantics?
https://www.tesladeaths.com/
There are electric cars that are not Teslas…