BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down11
arrow-up13arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoI’m not sure what your point is here
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
I’m not sure what your point is here
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?