Context (for those who don’t know): Israel and Palestine

  • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    One group was actually living there and the other group moved in and literally ripped people from their homes.

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s been happening for the last 5,000 years in that region though, since the Canaanites.

      It’s not like the Palestinians were the first there.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The Palestinians are descendants of the ancient canaanites. Most of the people in that region never left they just changed their religion at some point. This hasn’t always been happening, in Ottoman times Christians Jews and Muslims peacefully coexisted in the region.

        • Roboticide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean, kinda? They’re also heavily descended from 7th Century AD Arabic conquerors, but yes, many other natives may have adopted Arabic culture, language and religion at that time.

          But Jewish culture is also derived from the Canaanite culture, with arguably more overlap. Jewish culture in the region can be traced back to at least the 9th Century BC, with the literal Kingdom of Israel. So the argument of “Well who was there first?” does not necessarily favor the Palestinians over the Israelis.

          This has always been happening though. It’s not like the Ottomans took over the region peacefully. It’s been conquered and re-conquered by Babylonians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans…

  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    “promising to give two different groups”? You mean the natives and the colonisers? Tf is this “meme”?

  • jarfil@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Alternate caption: “Zionists smuggling in settlers before the British mandate ended to have enough votes to create a State of Israel as a safe haven for Holocaust refugees, then getting populated mostly by Jews fleeing Arab countries out of fear of retaliation for having created the State of Israel a day early and having pushed most Palestinians out by force”

  • erranto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Britain has planted the seeds of hatred and bloodshed in the middle east and is now acting as if it has no responsibility towards resolving the conflict.

    It is hard to watch the British media coverage of this war acting all outraged and surprised by the violence while being proud of their historical imperial inheritance .

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Even animals patrol and defend their territory. Why should human be any different? If anything else, borders are an improvement over constant skirmishes and raids where two different ethnic groups meet.

      EDIT: Interesting how you completely ignored the “Borders are a solution to constant ethnic clashes” part of my comment