

Is this only searching in pirate bay? Or did I misunderstand the readme?
I use Jackett for this.
West Asia - Communist - international politics - anti-imperialism - software development - Math, science, chemistry, history, sociology, and a lot more.


Is this only searching in pirate bay? Or did I misunderstand the readme?
I use Jackett for this.


The alternative most people probably use is iterative loops, like for loops and while loops and the like, with a mutable variable somewhere. I don’t love it, personally.
I guess the other potential alternative is doing the iteration recursively, but I doubt that’s what most people think of as an alternative to reduce.
I’m surprised that you had trouble port forwarding on airvpn. My understanding is mullvad doesn’t allow port forwarding, and Proton allows it but it’s extremely finicky and you have to constantly poll for it with some script (or maybe if you use their official client then you don’t need that, but I didn’t). Port forwarding was, why I went with airvpn.
Another benefit you miss is isolation
You’re using “open source” as defined by OSI. Just wanted to note that open source historically arose in protest to the corporate walled gardens that dominated the software ecosystem, rather than a movement to give companies a large eco-system of free-to-use software for profit. It was about individuals having access.
But I am not going to argue that what I am proposing is open source. I will accept that open source as a term has already been coopted to serve corporations.
forces you to share the code, even when it is not deployed
It would only apply to for-profit entities. It would be extremely difficult to enforce on an individual level anyways, and it would disagree with the spirit here.
forces you to pay a tithe to the developer.
I called that profit sharing earlier, but you can call it that too, sure.
isn’t that similar to gpl?
That is correct. GPL has the same problem.
why should the company’s profit go to a developer they don’t employ?
I dont agree with the idea that paying non-employees is a foreign concept. Many companies pay, for example, Adobe for Adobe suite software, or Google for Google suite software, despite not hiring them as employees. They pay rent to property owners despite not hiring them as employees. The idea that only employees must be paid is unfounded.
Now, to answer “why should they pay them”, well, in exchange for their labor.
I haven’t looked into it, but I will. My only worry is that it will discourage many people from it due to political biases against the naming.
Not good enough. Companies are still allowed to use this software freely, make massive profits without anything going to the developer. It is truly free labor.
They are even allowed to modify it, even make derivative work, without open sourcing it, as long as they don’t distribute said derivative work.


It really saddens me to see so many evil people live long happy lives, then see victims of abuse and struggle like her die so young 😔. I truly wish there’s an afterlife to bring us justice.


This is good data, but unfortunately the write up obfuscates it, and is seemingly AI generated. If you prefer not to spend the time on a write up, I recommend you just publish the data table only. The write up did not add any substance to your otherwise great work.
Not only that, they have historically refused deals to purchase military equipment, and have always preferred purchasing technology so they can make it themselves.
But aren’t seedboxes more expensive? Why prefer them?
deleted by creator


Tbh I don’t know what gamescope is, but I’ll look into that and try it out to see. Thanks!


I thought about trying it out, didn’t get to it yet. I will now. Thanks!


It’s Gentoo. That could be possible, maybe something to do with the open vs non-open variant. I will look into it.


I wouldn’t call sway a custom WM, it uses wlroots which has become a standard.
Though I agree that wlroots seem to vary significantly in results with gnome and KDE based Wayland.
Thanks for your response. Your argument is convincing and I have no refutation, I appreciate you taking the time.
The only thing I would say is I bet this is still fixable with policy without having to ban or restrict immigration. But alas, that’s a different discussion, and your point that there are valid non racist reasons to criticize immigration is correct. Thanks again!
Thanks for your response! You are making an assumption that most or all immigrants wish they didn’t have to immigrate. I will answer assuming this is true, though I am not confident it is. But let’s go with it.
Changes in material conditions of a country typically occur due to political action. That may be in terms of voting, political movements, or outside forces like war or sanctions. Addressing each of those:
And last, even if what you quoted is true, I bet whoever said it is likely not considering putting the effort of making their country better in the same way they want immigrants to. Maybe that’s not one of the worse forms of racism, but it is one.
I second this. Would add gobolinux